RE: feedback wanted--SMC Takumar 500/4.5

2004-08-07 Thread J. C. O'Connell
you buy the non-SMC version you better save some money as it is still very good but should sell for quite a bit less than the SMC version. JCO -Original Message- From: Jim Colwell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, August 07, 2004 12:15 PM To: pdml Subject: RE: feedback wanted--SMC

RE: feedback wanted--SMC Takumar 500/4.5

2004-08-07 Thread Jim Colwell
JCO, If you have a M42 camera then it may make sense to consider that the Takumar is an advantage. Do you have any information that suggests the K and Takumar versions have different optics and/or apertures ? My comments are based on the following quotation from Alex Nemerovsky's site: "K500/4.

RE: feedback wanted--SMC Takumar 500/4.5

2004-08-07 Thread J. C. O'Connell
screwmount and K-mount bodies, whereas the "K" version is limited to "K" bodies only. JCO -Original Message- From: Jim Colwell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, August 07, 2004 8:26 AM To: pdml Subject: feedback wanted--SMC Takumar 500/4.5 I have the SMC 500/4.5

feedback wanted--SMC Takumar 500/4.5

2004-08-07 Thread Jim Colwell
I have the SMC 500/4.5 "K mount" version of the SMC Takumar 500/4.5, and I'm very happy with it. AFIK, it is exactly the same as the Tak version, and since it has a manual aperture (not controlled by the body), it makes little difference which you get. I use my SMC 500/4.5 "straight up", and with

RE: feedback wanted--SMC Takumar 500/4.5

2004-08-06 Thread J. C. O'Connell
: RE: feedback wanted--SMC Takumar 500/4.5 Actually, I read somewhere that Canon has an AF lens in the 1200 range that costs 50-70 thousand dollars. I found it on there site, but there was no price given. >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 8/6/2004 3:09:43 PM >>> I wouldn't pay $1

RE: feedback wanted--SMC Takumar 500/4.5

2004-08-06 Thread Steve Desjardins
per wide angle! :) JCO -Original Message- From: mike wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 06, 2004 3:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: feedback wanted--SMC Takumar 500/4.5 Hi, Jim Apilado wrote: > I got one of these lenses a few years ago for $100 a millimeter! Y

Re: feedback wanted--SMC Takumar 500/4.5

2004-08-06 Thread Gonz
You beat me to it! lol mike wilson wrote: Hi, Jim Apilado wrote: I got one of these lenses a few years ago for $100 a millimeter! You paid $50,000 for a lens? Will you be my friend? mike

RE: feedback wanted--SMC Takumar 500/4.5

2004-08-06 Thread J. C. O'Connell
I wouldn't pay $100 a millimeter for ANY lens even a super wide angle! :) JCO -Original Message- From: mike wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 06, 2004 3:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: feedback wanted--SMC Takumar 500/4.5 Hi, Jim Apilado wrote: &g

Re: feedback wanted--SMC Takumar 500/4.5

2004-08-06 Thread mike wilson
Hi, Jim Apilado wrote: I got one of these lenses a few years ago for $100 a millimeter! You paid $50,000 for a lens? Will you be my friend? mike

Re: feedback wanted--SMC Takumar 500/4.5

2004-08-06 Thread Jim Apilado
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 09:06:46 -0500 (CDT) > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: feedback wanted--SMC Takumar 500/4.5 > Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Resent-Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 10:34:44 -0400 > > > I stumbled upon a