e: > Bill
Owens wrote:
The latest issue arrived yesterday with a very
thorough review of the film
*ist. According to them, it's a very nice camera
for the money. Biggest
gripe was no flash confirmation.
Bill
Has anybody scanned this article, I would
Bill wrote:
BO> The latest issue arrived yesterday with a very thorough review of the film
BO> *ist. According to them, it's a very nice camera for the money.
The key word is indeed "for the money".
To quote a friend: "I peeked at the corners of the viewfinder and
there it was a jumbel of
on 25.09.03 1:01, Bill Owens at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The latest issue arrived yesterday with a very thorough review of the film
> *ist. According to them, it's a very nice camera for the money. Biggest
> gripe was no flash confirmation.
Maybe there was no flash confirmation
Doesn't it have flash confirmation? the lil flash
thing blinks alot to confirm it worked? right?
--- Johan Uiterwijk Winkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bill
Owens wrote:
>
> >The latest issue arrived yesterday with a very
> thorough review of the film
> >*ist.
Bill Owens wrote:
The latest issue arrived yesterday with a very thorough review of the film
*ist. According to them, it's a very nice camera for the money. Biggest
gripe was no flash confirmation.
Bill
Has anybody scanned this article, I would be glad to read it .
Johan Uiterwijk Winkel.
Even if they didn't they deserve the award as pioneers of plastic in
photography.
At 03:36 PM 3/10/2003 -0600, you wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Caveman"
Subject: Film *ist (was Re: KAF3 lens mount already here?)
>
>
> BTW, which company was the first to
> That's great news. It hints that Pentax has abandoned the idea of using
> plastic lens mount.
But not on the lenses, unfortunately :o(
Pål
- Original Message -
From: "Caveman"
Subject: Film *ist (was Re: KAF3 lens mount already here?)
>
>
> BTW, which company was the first to manufacture cameras with plastic
> lens mounts ? They really deserve the first place in the "Infamous Top
> 10&
KT Takeshita wrote:
1. *ist is indeed an "entry level" body. It has to be considered a P&S
camera with a mirror box(!).
That's great news. It hints that Pentax has abandoned the idea of using
plastic lens mount.
BTW, which company was the first to manufacture cameras with plastic
lens mounts ?
Hi!
MC> I'm thinking of getting a film *ist if it isn't too expensive. Anyone else?
For my purposes ZX-L that I have is just fine. By the way, I find no
problem with its AF, except than in some difficult conditions with
135/5.6 long end of the Sigma zoom that I use.
Don't for
ill
introduce something below it. It is pretty well spec'ed for it's
price point though.
Bruce
Monday, March 3, 2003, 12:04:55 AM, you wrote:
LLL> Does anyone have the specs for the film *ist? (or a link)
LLL> I assume (from the $319 list price) it is a lower end camera compeeting
LL
Does anyone have the specs for the film *ist? (or a link)
I assume (from the $319 list price) it is a lower end camera compeeting
more with the MZ/ZX-10, 30, 50, 60 then the 7, 6, 5(n), 3.
Am I correct?
L
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 19:57:12 -0500
From: Caveman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Caveman wrote:
"I definitely hope that the pop-up flash on the *ist could be permanently
turned off ;-) If not, then some duct tape will certainly solve the
problem ;-)"
I can't help but share this cartoon, reprinted in the
Michael Cross wrote:
>
> I'm thinking of getting a film *ist if it isn't too expensive. Anyone else?
>
> Michael
I am interested in it. Price & how well the autofocus works would
probably be the deciding factors
--
David S.
Nature and wildlife photography http://www.sheppardphotos.com
- Original Message -
From: "Caveman"
Subject: Re: "No Flash" that reverts to "Flash" (was: Re: Hands Up II: What
About the Film *ist?)
>
> > It's my wife's camera. I HATE
> > that feature, on any camera. In fact, there's no wa
> From: "Michael Cross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I'm thinking of getting a film *ist if it isn't too expensive. Anyone
> else?
Me too.
Barring disastrous reviews, I'll be investing in a *ist, AF360FGZ and a
battery grip with vertical shutter release (Yeah!!!)
Not me again. :( Spent too much money on lenses already and I don't need
more than 2 bodies. Perhaps when money was no subject, I would buy the
upcoming flagship model. But that didn't happen to the MZ-S so...
regards,
Alan Chan
I'm thinking of getting a film *ist if it isn&
just set it there. The ZX-L way is more like an afterthought done in
firmware rather than designed specifically.
Bruce
Friday, February 28, 2003, 1:58:51 PM, you wrote:
MC> The film *ist seems to solve all the little complaints that I have about
MC> the ZX-L:
MC>1. Improved AF (I ho
st me a black eye. So I
eventually sticked a piece of black electrical insulation tape on the
flash window.
Michael Cross wrote:
The film *ist seems to solve all the little complaints that I have about
the ZX-L:
1. Improved AF (I hope I hope)
2. Option to cancel automatic film rewind
3. C
, 1:58:51 PM, you wrote:
MC> The film *ist seems to solve all the little complaints that I have about
MC> the ZX-L:
MC>1. Improved AF (I hope I hope)
MC>2. Option to cancel automatic film rewind
MC>3. Continuous AF selection
MC>4. Even smaller--size matters!!!
chael
MC> Bruce Dayton wrote:
>>Michael,
>>
>>That one is already on my list and funded. Just waiting to be able to
>>order it.
>>
>>
>>Bruce
>>
>>
>>
>>Friday, February 28, 2003, 11:21:00 AM, you wrote:
>>
>>MC> I'm thinking of getting a film *ist if it isn't too expensive. Anyone else?
>>
>>MC> Michael
>>
>>
>>
>>
Michael Cross wrote:
I'm thinking of getting a film *ist if it isn't too expensive. Anyone
else?
Me. With a FA 50mm lens that I already have and the new Velvia 100F, it
should work great. If it proves to be a really nice camera, I'll buy
some more AF lenses. Starting with the
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Cross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Hands Up II: What About the Film *ist?
> I'm thinking of getting a film *ist if it isn't too expensive. Anyone
else?
Me, but probably rather for my wife, because 1)I suppose the *is
Michael,
That one is already on my list and funded. Just waiting to be able to
order it.
Bruce
Friday, February 28, 2003, 11:21:00 AM, you wrote:
MC> I'm thinking of getting a film *ist if it isn't too expensive. Anyone else?
MC> Michael
24 matches
Mail list logo
