rom: "Scott Loveless" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: help needed for new pentax lens website
>
>
>
>
> > 42
> >
> > John Francis wrote:
> >> How many countable infinities are there?
> >>
> >> On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at
---Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> > Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 03 April 2008 16:44
> > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > Subject: Re: help needed for new pentax lens website
> >
> > I would t
Yeah! Chuck Norris counted to infinity. Twice. :D
If you add the M42 lens then you should also add the Pentacon Six and
Pentax 67 and 645 lens too. There are adapters for 645 made by Pentax, and
Pentacon Six lenses are very common to be mounted on any 35mm cam.
.t
> There are an infinite number
nt: 03 April 2008 16:44
> > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > Subject: Re: help needed for new pentax lens website
> >
> > I would think it best to restrict something like this to
> > lenses that can be used without an adapter. It might be
> > worthwhile to inclu
There are an infinite number countable infinities, of course 8)
On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 18:50:09 -0400, John Francis wrote
> How many countable infinities are there?
>
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 05:28:24PM -0400, Steve Desjardins wrote:
> > I've always liked the countable infinities. The uncountable o
> 42
Are you suggesting coconuts migrate?
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Loveless" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: help needed for new pentax lens website
> 42
>
> John Francis wrote:
>> How m
An infinite number, you can count them all you want...
John Francis wrote:
> How many countable infinities are there?
>
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 05:28:24PM -0400, Steve Desjardins wrote:
>
>> I've always liked the countable infinities. The uncountable ones seem
>> so passe.
>>
>>
> D
John Francis wrote:
> How many countable infinities are there?
I don't know, but I'd guess there's an uncountably infinite number of them.
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, pleas
42
John Francis wrote:
> How many countable infinities are there?
>
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 05:28:24PM -0400, Steve Desjardins wrote:
>> I've always liked the countable infinities. The uncountable ones seem
>> so passe.
>>
> Doug Franklin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 04/03/08 5:11 PM >>>
>> Steve D
How many countable infinities are there?
On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 05:28:24PM -0400, Steve Desjardins wrote:
> I've always liked the countable infinities. The uncountable ones seem
> so passe.
>
> >>> Doug Franklin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 04/03/08 5:11 PM >>>
> Steve Desjardins wrote:
> > Sure, accor
Steve Desjardins wrote:
> I've always liked the countable infinities. The uncountable ones seem
> so passe.
Well, then, that lets the infinity of human stupidity right out.
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I've always liked the countable infinities. The uncountable ones seem
so passe.
>>> Doug Franklin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 04/03/08 5:11 PM >>>
Steve Desjardins wrote:
> Sure, according to the Mathematicians. And they're almost as
unhelpful
> as the philosophers.
>
> Steve the philosophy major
>
>>
Scott Loveless wrote:
> John Francis wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 12:27:39PM -0400, Scott Loveless wrote:
>> A mathematician doesn't care what the value of 2+2 is; Relating this
>> to things that happen in the real world is a physics problem.
>>
> Christie says "I like him." She doesn't think
Steve Desjardins wrote:
> Sure, according to the Mathematicians. And they're almost as unhelpful
> as the philosophers.
>
> Steve the philosophy major
>
"Bob W" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 4/3/2008 11:53 AM >>>
>> anywhere close to infinity
>
> is it possible for anything to be close to infinity?
Ah, but those are Zenit lenses another kettle of fish altogether.
Adam Maas wrote:
> But the Zenit M39 lenses can be used (Leica thread with M42/K register)
>
> -Adam
>
> On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 12:33 PM, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Ok so the Leica S mount lenses could only be u
John Graves wrote:
> Scott,
>
> Sure.and the sine of the square root of 1 comes right up any time
> you ask. Huh?
>
Hold on a sec. I'll ask.
--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_p
Scott,
Sure.and the sine of the square root of 1 comes right up any time
you ask. Huh?
John Graves
WA1JG
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Scott Loveless wrote:
> Steve Desjardins wrote:
>
>> Sure, according to the Mathematicians. And they're almost as unhelpful
>> as the philosophers.
>>
>
>
Steve Desjardins wrote:
> I happen to like mathematicians quite a bit. They're much more useful
> than philosophers. Granted, it helps than I'm married to one. Now if
> only I could teach her to add 2+2 in her head.
Mathematicians prove things. Addition is left as an exercise for the
lis
But the Zenit M39 lenses can be used (Leica thread with M42/K register)
-Adam
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 12:33 PM, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok so the Leica S mount lenses could only be used a macro distances, but
> the Canon f0.95 would let in a lot of light!
>
>
>
> P. J. Alling w
John Francis wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 12:27:39PM -0400, Scott Loveless wrote:
>> Steve Desjardins wrote:
>>> Sure, according to the Mathematicians. And they're almost as unhelpful
>>> as the philosophers.
>> I happen to like mathematicians quite a bit. They're much more useful
>> than ph
On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 12:27:39PM -0400, Scott Loveless wrote:
> Steve Desjardins wrote:
> > Sure, according to the Mathematicians. And they're almost as unhelpful
> > as the philosophers.
>
> I happen to like mathematicians quite a bit. They're much more useful
> than philosophers. Granted,
On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 04:53:07PM +0100, Bob W wrote:
> > anywhere close to infinity
>
> is it possible for anything to be close to infinity? Any philosophers
> out there?
>
> Bob
Well, by definition, if any of the philosophers are out there then it
must be possible for something to be close to
Steve Desjardins wrote:
> Sure, according to the Mathematicians. And they're almost as unhelpful
> as the philosophers.
I happen to like mathematicians quite a bit. They're much more useful
than philosophers. Granted, it helps than I'm married to one. Now if
only I could teach her to add 2+2
infinity? Any philosophers
out there?
Bob
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 03 April 2008 16:44
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: help needed for new pentax lens website
>
>
Hi P.J.,
I didn't make myself clear enough it seems (sorry, english is not my
native tongue, but i'll try my best). The point is not to have a
*complete* list of lenses that in theory can be somehow attached to a
pentax body, who would want that anyway? maybe such a list would be
historical in
-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: help needed for new pentax lens website
>
> I would think it best to restrict something like this to
> lenses that can be used without an adapter. It might be
> worthwhile to include m42 Pentax lenses, but I would draw the
> line there. BTW, although
I would think it best to restrict something like this to lenses that can be
used without an adapter. It might be worthwhile to include m42 Pentax lenses,
but I would draw the line there. BTW, although you can fit a Leica 39mm
screwmount lens to a Pentax with adapters, it won't focus anywhere clo
Well you've set yourself an enduring hobby. Any m42 lens and the
earlier m37 and c, (video, 8mm(?)), mount), Bessamatic or Kodak Retina
IIIS/Reflex with the proper adapter, I think there may even be a Leica
S (m39) mount to m42 adapter which opens all of the Leica, and copies
such as Canon, (
Ok so the Leica S mount lenses could only be used a macro distances, but
the Canon f0.95 would let in a lot of light!
P. J. Alling wrote:
> Well you've set yourself an enduring hobby. Any m42 lens and the
> earlier m37 and c, (video, 8mm(?)), mount), Bessamatic or Kodak Retina
> IIIS/Reflex w
Hi everybody,
as mentioned in the subject, i need your help :-)
I'm in the process of building a website that will hold a database with
all lenses usable on Pentax bodies (with preference for the digital
ones). I know, there is Bojidar Dimitrov's excellent k-mount web page
(and some others), b
30 matches
Mail list logo