On Dec 11, 2009, at 11:38 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
And here I am wondering what happened to the f/2.8 zooms Pentax used to
make :(
People are so sedentary these days they don't have the upper body strength
to carry them.
The sell for outrageously high prices on ebay so that their
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 1:32 AM, David Mann dm...@bluemoon.net.nz wrote:
On Dec 10, 2009, at 1:50 AM, mike wilson wrote:
Gone in 23 minutes. Must be true.
And here I am wondering what happened to the f/2.8 zooms Pentax used to make
:(
Dave
--
What, like the 16-50 f2.8 and 50-135 f2.8?
David Mann wrote:
On Dec 10, 2009, at 1:50 AM, mike wilson wrote:
Gone in 23 minutes. Must be true.
And here I am wondering what happened to the f/2.8 zooms Pentax used to make :(
People are so sedentary these days they don't have the upper body
strength to carry them.
--
PDML
2009/12/9 Peter Loveday pe...@loveday.org:
Have they not noticed the gap left between the 16-45 / 16-50 / 17-70 / 18-55
(x4) zooms? I am really hanging out for a 17.5-59mm model. Preferably
f/3.1.
MARK!!!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
mike wilson wrote:
David Mann wrote:
On Dec 10, 2009, at 1:50 AM, mike wilson wrote:
Gone in 23 minutes. Must be true.
And here I am wondering what happened to the f/2.8 zooms Pentax used
to make :(
People are so sedentary these days they don't have the upper body
strength to carry
http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/forums/showflat.php/Cat/0/Number/850701/Main/850689/
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille/Thibs
--
Photo: K-7, Sigma 28/1.8 macro, FA50/1.4, DA40Ltd, K30/2.8, DA16-45,
DA50-135, DA50-200, 360FGZ ...
Laptop: Macbook 13 Unibody SnowLeo/Win7
Yum yum...
Dario
- Original Message -
From: Thibouille pentaxl...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 12:16 PM
Subject: hum hum
http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/forums/showflat.php/Cat/0/Number/850701/Main/850689
Gone in 23 minutes. Must be true.
Thibouille pentaxl...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/forums/showflat.php/Cat/0/Number/850701/Main/850689/
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille/Thibs
--
Photo: K-7, Sigma 28/1.8 macro, FA50/1.4, DA40Ltd,
http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/forums/showflat.php/Cat/0/Number/850701/Main/850689/
Another 100mm macro?
What are they thinking.
Have they not noticed the gap left between the 16-45 / 16-50 / 17-70 / 18-55
(x4) zooms? I am really hanging out for a 17.5-59mm model. Preferably
f/3.1.
The 16-45 is on the way out (logical IMO).
Neither wr or L 18-55 and 50-200 should go as well.
On Wednesday, December 9, 2009, Peter Loveday pe...@loveday.org wrote:
http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/forums/showflat.php/Cat/0/Number/850701/Main/850689/
Another 100mm macro?
What are they
On Dec 10, 2009, at 1:50 AM, mike wilson wrote:
Gone in 23 minutes. Must be true.
And here I am wondering what happened to the f/2.8 zooms Pentax used to make :(
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
11 matches
Mail list logo