Re: hum hum....

2009-12-11 Thread David Mann
On Dec 11, 2009, at 11:38 AM, P. J. Alling wrote: And here I am wondering what happened to the f/2.8 zooms Pentax used to make :( People are so sedentary these days they don't have the upper body strength to carry them. The sell for outrageously high prices on ebay so that their

Re: hum hum....

2009-12-11 Thread Adam Maas
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 1:32 AM, David Mann dm...@bluemoon.net.nz wrote: On Dec 10, 2009, at 1:50 AM, mike wilson wrote: Gone in 23 minutes.  Must be true. And here I am wondering what happened to the f/2.8 zooms Pentax used to make :( Dave -- What, like the 16-50 f2.8 and 50-135 f2.8?

Re: hum hum....

2009-12-10 Thread mike wilson
David Mann wrote: On Dec 10, 2009, at 1:50 AM, mike wilson wrote: Gone in 23 minutes. Must be true. And here I am wondering what happened to the f/2.8 zooms Pentax used to make :( People are so sedentary these days they don't have the upper body strength to carry them. -- PDML

Re: hum hum....

2009-12-10 Thread eckinator
2009/12/9 Peter Loveday pe...@loveday.org: Have they not noticed the gap left between the 16-45 / 16-50 / 17-70 / 18-55 (x4) zooms?  I am really hanging out for a 17.5-59mm model.  Preferably f/3.1. MARK!!! -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

Re: hum hum....

2009-12-10 Thread P. J. Alling
mike wilson wrote: David Mann wrote: On Dec 10, 2009, at 1:50 AM, mike wilson wrote: Gone in 23 minutes. Must be true. And here I am wondering what happened to the f/2.8 zooms Pentax used to make :( People are so sedentary these days they don't have the upper body strength to carry

hum hum....

2009-12-09 Thread Thibouille
http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/forums/showflat.php/Cat/0/Number/850701/Main/850689/ -- Thibault Massart aka Thibouille/Thibs -- Photo: K-7, Sigma 28/1.8 macro, FA50/1.4, DA40Ltd, K30/2.8, DA16-45, DA50-135, DA50-200, 360FGZ ... Laptop: Macbook 13 Unibody SnowLeo/Win7

Re: hum hum....

2009-12-09 Thread Dario Bonazza
Yum yum... Dario - Original Message - From: Thibouille pentaxl...@gmail.com To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 12:16 PM Subject: hum hum http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/forums/showflat.php/Cat/0/Number/850701/Main/850689

Re: hum hum....

2009-12-09 Thread mike wilson
Gone in 23 minutes. Must be true. Thibouille pentaxl...@gmail.com wrote: http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/forums/showflat.php/Cat/0/Number/850701/Main/850689/ -- Thibault Massart aka Thibouille/Thibs -- Photo: K-7, Sigma 28/1.8 macro, FA50/1.4, DA40Ltd,

Re: hum hum....

2009-12-09 Thread Peter Loveday
http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/forums/showflat.php/Cat/0/Number/850701/Main/850689/ Another 100mm macro? What are they thinking. Have they not noticed the gap left between the 16-45 / 16-50 / 17-70 / 18-55 (x4) zooms? I am really hanging out for a 17.5-59mm model. Preferably f/3.1.

Re: hum hum....

2009-12-09 Thread Thibouille
The 16-45 is on the way out (logical IMO). Neither wr or L 18-55 and 50-200 should go as well. On Wednesday, December 9, 2009, Peter Loveday pe...@loveday.org wrote: http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/forums/showflat.php/Cat/0/Number/850701/Main/850689/ Another 100mm macro? What are they

Re: hum hum....

2009-12-09 Thread David Mann
On Dec 10, 2009, at 1:50 AM, mike wilson wrote: Gone in 23 minutes. Must be true. And here I am wondering what happened to the f/2.8 zooms Pentax used to make :( Dave -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,