Re: mailing film and insurance (was Re: bad processing)

2001-04-08 Thread tom
John Mustarde wrote: > > On Thu, 05 Apr 2001 19:08:57 -0400, you wrote: > > >I guess even with insurance, I'm still leery. Say I do 500 weddings in > >my life, and I mail out the film for all of them. What would be the odds > >that the carriers go 500 for 500? Maybe I distrust the carriers too >

Re: mailing film and insurance (was Re: bad processing)

2001-04-08 Thread John Mustarde
On Thu, 05 Apr 2001 19:08:57 -0400, you wrote: >I guess even with insurance, I'm still leery. Say I do 500 weddings in >my life, and I mail out the film for all of them. What would be the odds >that the carriers go 500 for 500? Maybe I distrust the carriers too >much, but I have a feeling the odd

RE: mailing film and insurance (was Re: bad processing)

2001-04-05 Thread Len Paris
> What are the options besides PPA? > > I guess even with insurance, I'm still leery. Say I > do 500 weddings in > my life, and I mail out the film for all of them. > What would be the odds > that the carriers go 500 for 500? Maybe I distrust > the carriers too > much, but I have a feeling the odd

Re: mailing film and insurance (was Re: bad processing)

2001-04-05 Thread aimcompute
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 5:08 PM Subject: mailing film and insurance (was Re: bad processing) > Len Paris wrote: > > > > And that's a healthy kind of paranoia for a wedding shooter! Do > > you belong to any of the professional orga

mailing film and insurance (was Re: bad processing)

2001-04-05 Thread tom
Len Paris wrote: > > And that's a healthy kind of paranoia for a wedding shooter! Do > you belong to any of the professional organizations? You can > get insurance through some of them against just that sort of > thing. What are the options besides PPA? I guess even with insurance, I'm still