PESO: no name

2006-01-27 Thread Gautam Sarup
No name and no Pentax content either. This was shot with an M6 and 50mm Elmar on Efke KB100 in the San Francisco Chinatown. Comments are welcome. http://static.flickr.com/42/81380197_98d51dd376_b.jpg Cheers, Gautam

Re: no name

2006-01-28 Thread Kenneth Waller
Sorry, but this has no appeal for me. Kenneth Waller - Original Message - From: "Gautam Sarup" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: PESO: no name No name and no Pentax content either. This was shot with an M6 and 50mm Elmar on Efke KB100 in the San Francisco Chinatow

Re: no name

2006-01-28 Thread Don Williams
I wonder how much real ivory is amongst all that fake stuff? Don Kenneth Waller wrote: Sorry, but this has no appeal for me. Kenneth Waller - Original Message - From: "Gautam Sarup" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: PESO: no name No name and no Pentax content either

Re: no name

2006-01-29 Thread Gautam Sarup
utam Sarup" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: PESO: no name > > > > No name and no Pentax content either. This was shot with an M6 > > and 50mm Elmar on Efke KB100 in the San Francisco Chinatown. > > > > Comments are welcome. > > > > http://static.flickr.com/42/81380197_98d51dd376_b.jpg > > > > Cheers, > > Gautam > > > >

Re: no name

2006-01-29 Thread Gautam Sarup
> > > > - Original Message - From: "Gautam Sarup" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: PESO: no name > > > > > >> No name and no Pentax content either. This was shot with an M6 > >> and 50mm Elmar on Efke KB100 in the San Francisco

Re: no name

2006-01-29 Thread Kenneth Waller
29, 2006 6:47 PM Subject: Re: no name Ken is it totally off or do you think something could be done to give it some appeal? Thanks, Gautam On 1/28/06, Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Sorry, but this has no appeal for me. Kenneth Waller - Original Message - From:

Re: no name

2006-01-29 Thread Gautam Sarup
e might > increase the appeal. > > Kenneth Waller > > - Original Message - > From: "Gautam Sarup" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2006 6:47 PM > Subject: Re: no name > > > > Ken is it totally off or do you think s

Re: no name

2006-01-30 Thread keith_w
of those! Just my 2ยข -- keith whaley On 1/28/06, Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Sorry, but this has no appeal for me. Kenneth Waller - Original Message - From: "Gautam Sarup" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: PESO: no name No name and no Pentax con

Re: no name

2006-01-31 Thread Gautam Sarup
> keith whaley > > > > On 1/28/06, Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>Sorry, but this has no appeal for me. > >> > >>Kenneth Waller > > > >>- Original Message - > >>From: "Gauta

Re: PESO: no name

2006-01-31 Thread Boris Liberman
Hi! No name and no Pentax content either. This was shot with an M6 and 50mm Elmar on Efke KB100 in the San Francisco Chinatown. Comments are welcome. http://static.flickr.com/42/81380197_98d51dd376_b.jpg Gautam, on my monitor I don't see anything really white... Is this the wa

Re: PESO: no name

2006-01-31 Thread Gautam Sarup
Hi Boris, I should have exposed one more stop. Thanks to the comments here I think the whole thing needs to be redone. Will give it another shot when I'm in Chinatown next. Cheers, Gautam On 1/31/06, Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > > > No name and n

Re: PESO: no name

2006-01-31 Thread Jack Davis
m Sarup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Boris, > > I should have exposed one more stop. Thanks to the comments > here I think the whole thing needs to be redone. Will give it > another shot when I'm in Chinatown next. > > Cheers, > Gautam > > On 1/31/06, Boris

Re: PESO: no name

2006-01-31 Thread Gautam Sarup
d have exposed one more stop. Thanks to the comments > > here I think the whole thing needs to be redone. Will give it > > another shot when I'm in Chinatown next. > > > > Cheers, > > Gautam > > > > On 1/31/06, Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w

Re: PESO: no name

2006-02-01 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
On Jan 31, 2006, at 2:22 PM, Gautam Sarup wrote: http://static.flickr.com/42/81380197_98d51dd376_b.jpg It's a bit too much of a jumble for me. Too many intersecting and disturbing masses, some in focus and some out of focus. Godfrey

Re: PESO: no name

2006-02-01 Thread Gautam Sarup
Thanks Godfrey. Cheers, Gautam On 2/1/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jan 31, 2006, at 2:22 PM, Gautam Sarup wrote: > > > http://static.flickr.com/42/81380197_98d51dd376_b.jpg > > It's a bit too much of a jumble for me. Too many intersecting and > disturbing masses, some in

PESO: No Name Hotel...

2005-05-03 Thread Albano Garcia
Hi gang, Feel free to comment, see other pics, etc: http://www.flaneur.albanogarcia.com.ar/?p=31#comments Regards, Albano Garcia Photography & Graphic Design http://www.albanogarcia.com.ar http://www.flaneur.com.ar __ Do You Yahoo!? Tire

Re: PESO: No Name Hotel...

2005-05-03 Thread frank theriault
On 5/3/05, Albano Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi gang, > Feel free to comment, see other pics, etc: > > http://www.flaneur.albanogarcia.com.ar/?p=31#comments > > Regards, > Love the geometries, the angles, the shadows and light. I like that there ~seems~ a lot of movement, when I actua

Re: PESO: No Name Hotel...

2005-05-03 Thread Albano Garcia
Thanks, Frank. It's taken from inside a bus. Regards Albano --- frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5/3/05, Albano Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Hi gang, > > Feel free to comment, see other pics, etc: > > > > > http://www.flaneur.albanogarcia.com.ar/?p=31#comments > > > >

Re: PESO: No Name Hotel...

2005-05-03 Thread frank theriault
On 5/3/05, Albano Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks, Frank. It's taken from inside a bus. > Regards HAR! So there was movement after all... -frank -- "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson

Re: PESO: No Name Hotel...

2005-05-03 Thread Boris Liberman
Hi! http://www.flaneur.albanogarcia.com.ar/?p=31#comments Albano, the way you named it is appropriate. And as such it works. One sits for a while thinking of the name and the view and finally kicks oneself in a forehead - oh yes! But, (as usual :) ) if you wouldn't attach a name to it, it kind o

Re: PESO: No Name Hotel...

2005-05-04 Thread Paul Stenquist
Fascinating shot. Much here to look at and ponder. And the name brings enough of a suggestion to stter one's thoughts in a certain direction. Great composition, nice color. Good work. Paul

Re: PESO: No Name Hotel...

2005-05-04 Thread Albano Garcia
Thanks for comments, Boris. --- Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > > > > http://www.flaneur.albanogarcia.com.ar/?p=31#comments > > Albano, the way you named it is appropriate. And as > such it works. One > sits for a while thinking of the name and the view > and finally kicks >

Re: PESO: No Name Hotel...

2005-05-04 Thread Albano Garcia
Thanks, Paul! --- Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Fascinating shot. Much here to look at and ponder. > And the name brings > enough of a suggestion to stter one's thoughts in a > certain direction. > Great composition, nice color. Good work. > Paul > > Albano Garcia Photography &

FS Friday - simple no-name ball head

2010-06-25 Thread Stan Halpin
Long story short - I had ordered a ball head from Hong Kong via eBay for use on my monopod. Communication problems and shipping delays meant that it didn't get here before my trip to Costa Rica. I bought this one as an alternative. I have since received the original which has a Arca-mount on the

Re: FS Friday - simple no-name ball head

2010-06-25 Thread Mat Maessen
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Stan Halpin wrote: > Long story short - I had ordered a ball head from Hong Kong via eBay for use > on my monopod. Communication problems and shipping delays > meant that it didn't get here before my trip to Costa Rica. I bought this one > as an alternative. I ha

Re: FS Friday - simple no-name ball head

2010-06-25 Thread Mat Maessen
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Mat Maessen wrote: >> $25 including shipping within the U.S. Contact me off-list if interested > > Stan, Sorry about that folks. Replying off-list... -Mat -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRI

Curious - who would make a no-name 85/1.4

2008-11-24 Thread Derby Chang
I had this on my ebay watch list and no one seems to have bought. Not that I'm interested either (my FA85 and the phrase cold dead hands comes to mind), but who would make a generic 85/1.4 lens. Seems odd Looks Tokina-ish http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=360107016306&ssPa

RE: Curious - who would make a no-name 85/1.4

2008-11-24 Thread Bob W
Samyang. http://www.syopt.co.kr/eng/product/manual_zoom.asp Bob > > I had this on my ebay watch list and no one seems to have bought. Not > that I'm interested either (my FA85 and the phrase cold dead > hands comes > to mind), but who would make a generic 85/1.4 lens. Seems odd > > Looks T

Re: Curious - who would make a no-name 85/1.4

2008-11-24 Thread Adam Maas
Interestingly, it's an Aspherical design, which is somewhat exotic for an 85. Wonder if it's any good. Loks like Samyang may be looking at moving up in the lens world. They're currently the replacement for Cosina at the low end of the 3rd party market. -Adam On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 3:58 AM, Bob

Re: Curious - who would make a no-name 85/1.4

2008-11-24 Thread Boris Liberman
Hi! On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 5:15 PM, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Loks like Samyang may be looking at moving up in the lens world. > They're currently the replacement for Cosina at the low end of the 3rd > party market. Adam, is the above the long version of "rubbish"? ;-) Boris -- P

Re: Curious - who would make a no-name 85/1.4

2008-11-24 Thread Adam Maas
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > > On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 5:15 PM, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Loks like Samyang may be looking at moving up in the lens world. >> They're currently the replacement for Cosina at the low end of the 3rd >

Re: Curious - who would make a no-name 85/1.4

2008-11-24 Thread Boris Liberman
I've FA 77 limited which serves all my moderate tele needs just nicely ;-). Adam Maas wrote: On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi! On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 5:15 PM, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Loks like Samyang may be looking at moving up in

RE: Curious - who would make a no-name 85/1.4

2008-11-24 Thread Brendan MacRae
Wierd. They note it goes to f22 but the one in the eBay ad only stopped to f16. -Brendan --- Bob W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Samyang. > > http://www.syopt.co.kr/eng/product/manual_zoom.asp > > Bob > > > > > I had this on my ebay watch list and no one seems > to have bought. Not > > that

RE: Curious - who would make a no-name 85/1.4

2008-11-24 Thread John Sessoms
From: "Bob W" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Samyang. http://www.syopt.co.kr/eng/product/manual_zoom.asp Bob Reported Attack Site! This web site at www.syopt.co.kr has been reported as an attack site and has been blocked based on your security preferences. > > I had this on my ebay watch list and

Re: Curious - who would make a no-name 85/1.4

2008-11-24 Thread P. J. Alling
Possibly anyone interested for Pentax might be put off by the lens mount, which is apparently Nikon F. So anyone looking for Pentax lenses would look elsewhere, and anyone looking for Nikon lenses wouldn't bother to look... Derby Chang wrote: I had this on my ebay watch list and no one seem