Notice how I easily changed the title to something meaningful so that folks
can tell what they're about to open from among a great onslaught of posts.
You digest people could be courteous if you wanted to be so. Just cut & past
the title of the post you're responding to into the "Subject" line of y
> Paul Franklin Stregevsky said:
>
> f/1.2 is 0.45 stop faster than f/1.4
>
>
> Gregory L. Hansen wrote:
>
> Going up by halves,
>
> f/1.0
> f/1.2
> f/1.4
So... is 1.2 half a stop faster than 1.4, or slightly less than half a
stop? I realize that this make no practical difference, but I'm
Paul Franklin Stregevsky said:
> Chris Brogden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> "I believe it's only a half-stop from 1.2 to 1.4."
>
> Here's how f/stops compare. I don't remember where I got these numbers. I
> may have derived them, so feel free to question them.
>
> f/1.2 is 0.45 stop faster than
3 matches
Mail list logo
