Re: perfect exposure

2003-11-05 Thread ernreed2
edwin posted, among many other things: > The more I think about the idea of "perfect" exposure the more I think it > is an almost useless, unattainable concept. > > The initial comment was that despite the supposed exposure latitude of > negative films, an exposure a

Re: perfect exposure

2003-11-05 Thread Bob Walkden
Hi, Wednesday, November 5, 2003, 1:28:13 PM, you wrote: > As I recall, the comment provoking much of that was that HCB could eyeball > perfect exposure, and then someone said with b&w film experienced photographers > could get close enough to make printable images. > I'm

Re: perfect exposure

2003-11-05 Thread frank theriault
Everytime I walk out of the house with a camera around my neck, I play a little game. I "guess the exposure", set the camera accordingly, and then see how it meters. I'm rarely off by more than a stop; usually I'm withing 1/2 stop. And, I'm truly not saying that to brag; quite the contrary.

Re: perfect exposure

2003-11-06 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Now, as good as HCB was, no one was (or is) better than > > Shel Belinkoff, late of this list > > His initials are SCB. Maybe that has something to do with it . SCB = Super Cartier-Bresson -- Email.it, the professional e-mail, gratis per te: http://www.email.it/f Sponsor: Sconti fino

Re: perfect exposure

2003-11-06 Thread edwin
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, frank theriault wrote: > Everytime I walk out of the house with a camera around my neck, I play a > little game. I "guess the exposure", set the camera accordingly, and then > see how it meters. I'm rarely off by more than a stop; usually I'm withing > 1/2 stop. I did ex

Re: perfect exposure

2003-11-06 Thread Herb Chong
those are 50,000 different exposure situations. you have a lot of situations, but not necessarily a lot of different ones. Herb - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 11:02 AM Subject: Re: perfect exposure

Re: perfect exposure

2003-11-06 Thread edwin
> those are 50,000 different exposure situations. you have a lot of > situations, but not necessarily a lot of different ones. True, a lot of my bazillions of exposures were made in similar situations. What the camera actually has, presumably, is 50,000 sets of relative values for the multiple

Re: perfect exposure

2003-11-07 Thread Herb Chong
time you could spend on making a better composition or looking for the exact moment. Herb - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 1:29 AM Subject: Re: perfect exposure > What the camera actually has, presum