On Sun, 30 Sep 2001, Cory or Brenda Waters wrote:
> I had the flash set to auto-mode. The setting on the flash calls for
> F8 when using ISO400 film. Probably a combination of the flash
> reading the room's lighting wrong and the distances being too high.
If you're using f8 at the maximum sync
A too high shutterspeed will not give you underexposure, but will partially
not expose the negative at all, because during the flash the shutter is
obscuring the negative partially. The part of the negative that is exposed
however should still show a correct exposure.
Whether the non exposed area
Maybe they weren't paying you, but what do they show their grandkids?
Film and processing aren't as cheap as they used to be, but they are
still cheaper than screwing up a job. Two days ago I put a test roll
through my camera to test one of my Vivitar 283 strobes and some
diffusers that I mad
Chris wrote:
"If the negatives are underexposed by a significant amount...
why? Did you
have the 5n set to spot-meter by mistake? Were you using the built-in
flash past 10 feet or letting it provide the majority of light for the
exposure? What could have caused it, do you think?"
I
d the exposure was pretty spot on
for most of them (using multisegment meteting).
Regards,
Paul J
- Original Message -
From: "Cory or Brenda Waters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2001 10:00 AM
Subject: the cost of my new camera
&g
What is causing the underexposure? You, the camera, the processing, the
flash?
I hope you get over this soon.
Frits Wüthrich
Cory Waters wrote:
> Hi list,
> Some of you (the ones who have REALLY good memories)may remember that I
> Purchased a MZ-5n From Paul Jones in Australia. You may further
I usually use manual mode when doing indoor shots. The setting I use most:
ISO400 print film, f2.8 or 4, 1/30 or 1/60s, TTL flash (or manual flash when
the situation allowed). This method has never failed me.
regards,
Alan Chan
>Some of you (the ones who have REALLY good memories)may remember
On Sat, 29 Sep 2001, Cory or Brenda Waters wrote:
> This morning I took about 170 pictures at a confirmation celebration as the
> "official" photographer. I was listed in the program and everything. Got
> them developed at Wal-Mart this afternoon.
>
> Disaster.
If the prints look underexposed
8 matches
Mail list logo