Watermarking

iWatermark was suggested as a solution. The other day I purchased the "Pro" version (Win7). It does fine with a few files at a time but seems to have a memory leak issue. Windows Explorer fails after program crashes. Something is rotten in Denmark. After about 6,000 images it craters. Feature-wi

Re: SemiOT: Watermarking

>iWatermark Pro >http://plumamazing.com/ > >G Thanks. Meets my need perfectly. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.

Re: SemiOT: Watermarking

On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 7:13 PM, CollinB wrote: > I've got a few thousand images to be marked before they go to the web. > PSE10 has watermarking, but it's nothing to write home about. > I would like to put a logo on each that is sized to the image. > To do that I'd l

Re: SemiOT: Watermarking

, and Android available. G On Dec 3, 2013, at 9:13 AM, CollinB wrote: > I've got a few thousand images to be marked before they go to the web. > PSE10 has watermarking, but it's nothing to write home about. > I would like to put a logo on each that is sized to the image. >

SemiOT: Watermarking

I've got a few thousand images to be marked before they go to the web. PSE10 has watermarking, but it's nothing to write home about. I would like to put a logo on each that is sized to the image. To do that I'd like to use some sort of com control to run PSE10. At least that's

watermarking again

someone, I forgot who, found the first watermarks I did on smugmug were distracting and i agreed. have a new one in place, as those who look at the bus stop peso will see. mainly serves more as a signature than a serious watermark. ann -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdm

Re: watermarking

Doug Franklin wrote: >Nick Wright wrote: > > >>Honestly, how dangerous do you all think it is to use a real signature >>as a copyright symbol on photos? >> >> > >I don't know, but I'm not going to be an early adopter on that one. > > > I really _don't_ think it is a good idea with the amou

Re: watermarking

Bob W wrote: >I mean Nevada. I guess it's not in Kansas any more... > >-- > Bob > > hehe see my reply before I saw this one a > > >>-Original Message- >>From: Bob W [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Sent: 04 March 2007 23:08 >>To: &

Re: watermarking

Bob W wrote: >I'm looking forward to seeing more. The Paris and the Kansas pictures >are very striking. > >-- > Bob > > > Thanks, Bob but > > Kansas? I don't think we're in Kansas anymore, Toto :) The one with the Georgia O'keefe sky is actually in Nevada outside of Reno - Ah , it's jus

Re: watermarking

to the whole site Ann > > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of >ann sanfedele >Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 5:46 PM >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >Subject: Re: watermarking > > >Jens, that was Dave Brooks wh

RE: watermarking

I mean Nevada. I guess it's not in Kansas any more... -- Bob > -Original Message- > From: Bob W [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 04 March 2007 23:08 > To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' > Subject: RE: watermarking > > I'm looking forward

Re: watermarking

Nick Wright wrote: > Honestly, how dangerous do you all think it is to use a real signature > as a copyright symbol on photos? I don't know, but I'm not going to be an early adopter on that one. -- Thanks, DougF (KG4LMZ) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/li

Re: watermarking

In a message dated 3/4/2007 12:07:40 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Marnie, you've been at the doughn uts again. And I'm not sure the beard suits you. === Darn. Oh, well. Marnie aka Doe ** AOL now offers free email to ev

RE: watermarking

I'm looking forward to seeing more. The Paris and the Kansas pictures are very striking. -- Bob > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > my homepage is > http://annsan.smugmug.com/ > but its a long way from finished > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/

Re: watermarking

In a message dated 3/4/2007 2:55:17 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: my homepage is http://annsan.smugmug.com/ but its a long way from finished ann === Looking good, ann. Marnie aka Doe :-) ** AOL now offers free email to ever

Re: watermarking

. a bit of frustration at first, but now I'm >>digging it. Much work yet to do. >> >>Re watermarking, I settled on this, for the moment - >> >> >> > http://tinyurl.com/2jfmlp > >I think adding the 'smugmug' address with different fon

Re: watermarking

OTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Markus >Maurer >Sendt: 4. marts 2007 10:03 >Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >Emne: RE: watermarking > > >Hi Jens >that looks good. >Did you find a way for an automatic Photoshop action working with different >dimension and r

Re: watermarking

le > Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 5:46 PM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: watermarking > > > Jens, that was Dave Brooks who had seen his work ripped off in reply to > Marnie, who doesn't use watermarks (yet) > ..sometimes interweaving responses gets confusing

RE: watermarking

ECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of ann sanfedele Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 5:46 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: watermarking Jens, that was Dave Brooks who had seen his work ripped off in reply to Marnie, who doesn't use watermarks (yet) ..sometimes interweaving resp

Re: watermarking

ooks > Sendt: 4. marts 2007 00:22 > Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Emne: Re: watermarking > > > I water mark my equestrian work, Banner right across the middle. > > I see a lot of my work on webshots, copy right aand all/ > > Dave the frustrated Brooks > > On 3

Re: watermarking

ch work yet to do. > > Re watermarking, I settled on this, for the moment - > http://tinyurl.com/2jfmlp I think adding the 'smugmug' address with different font is distracting. The watermark is too long that way, and the 'sannfedele' part is really nice and should be

RE: watermarking

ne af Markus Maurer Sendt: 4. marts 2007 10:03 Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Emne: RE: watermarking Hi Jens that looks good. Did you find a way for an automatic Photoshop action working with different dimension and resolution too? greetings Markus -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [m

RE: watermarking

Maurer Sendt: 4. marts 2007 10:03 Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Emne: RE: watermarking Hi Jens that looks good. Did you find a way for an automatic Photoshop action working with different dimension and resolution too? greetings Markus -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[

Re: watermarking

ation at first, but now I'm digging it. Much work yet to do. Re watermarking, I settled on this, for the moment - http://tinyurl.com/2jfmlp Ala Godders, I want people to know who took the photo and how to reach me but don't want the info to interfere with the photo. I jsut made

RE: watermarking

-Discuss Mail List Subject: RE: watermarking Sorry Nick, you idea was too good to not try and copy :-) http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/409079019/?reuploaded=1 Regards Jens Bladt http://www.jensbladt.dk +45 56 63 77 11 +45 23 43 85 77 Skype: jensbladt248 -Oprindelig meddelelse- Fra

Re: watermarking

//www.jensbladt.dk > +45 56 63 77 11 > +45 23 43 85 77 > Skype: jensbladt248 > > -Oprindelig meddelelse- > Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Nick > Wright > Sendt: 3. marts 2007 03:52 > Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Emne: Re: wate

RE: watermarking

: jensbladt248 -Oprindelig meddelelse- Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af David J Brooks Sendt: 4. marts 2007 00:22 Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Emne: Re: watermarking I water mark my equestrian work, Banner right across the middle. I see a lot of my work on webshots, copy

Re: watermarking

I water mark my equestrian work, Banner right across the middle. I see a lot of my work on webshots, copy right aand all/ Dave the frustrated Brooks On 3/3/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am seriously beginning to wonder if I should watermark my photos. > > Good thread. :-)

RE: watermarking

] vegne af Nick Wright Sendt: 3. marts 2007 03:52 Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Emne: Re: watermarking Ann, brave? I'm assuming you're talking about identity theft issues? Bob, which site refuses without cookies? The phojonick.com? Try this URL http://www.photoshelter.com/usr-show/Uu

Re: watermarking

Jens Bladt wrote: >Hi Ann >I use iWatermark. It facilitates your own watermark design: >http://www.scriptsoftware.com/iwatermark/ >Regards > >Jens Bladt > thanks, Jen actually, smugmug will do the watermarking for me as I load the shots - and I can remove the watermark quic

Re: watermarking

23 43 85 77 > Skype: jensbladt248 > > -Oprindelig meddelelse- > Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af ann > sanfedele > Sendt: 2. marts 2007 20:03 > Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Emne: watermarking > > > So now I'm signed up on

RE: watermarking

ens Bladt http://www.jensbladt.dk +45 56 63 77 11 +45 23 43 85 77 Skype: jensbladt248 -Oprindelig meddelelse- Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 3. marts 2007 18:27 Til: pdml@pdml.net Emne: Re: watermarking I am seriously beginning to won

Re: watermarking

I am seriously beginning to wonder if I should watermark my photos. Good thread. :-) Marnie aka Doe ** AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at http://www.aol.com. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

RE: watermarking

Sendt: 2. marts 2007 20:03 Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Emne: watermarking So now I'm signed up on smugmug - when quickly uploaded my ashley calendar pics and chose smugmug watermark I got a large and too concealing "proof" across the center of the image... one is permitted t

Re: watermarking

I use an action (when I remember too) in PS that took about 5 minutes to make & works on both portrait & landscape photos. I got the technique from a tutorial here: It's titled "Digital Watermark Branding" Instead of using an Illustrator file though

RE: watermarking

ann sanfedele Sendt: 2. marts 2007 20:03 Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Emne: watermarking So now I'm signed up on smugmug - when quickly uploaded my ashley calendar pics and chose smugmug watermark I got a large and too concealing "proof" across the center of the image... one is p

RE: watermarking

March 2007 02:52 > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: watermarking > > Ann, brave? I'm assuming you're talking about identity theft issues? > > Bob, which site refuses without cookies? The phojonick.com? Try this > URL http://www.photoshelter.com/usr-show/U00

Re: watermarking

Ann, brave? I'm assuming you're talking about identity theft issues? Bob, which site refuses without cookies? The phojonick.com? Try this URL http://www.photoshelter.com/usr-show/UueQds27tPXo does it do the same thing? -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/li

Re: watermarking

Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: >I don't put the watermarks on my larger files to keep people from >nabbing, stealing, etc them (I find it helps ... but online 'theft' >going to happen anyway if you post an image). The watermark is a way >for people to find me when they see something they like. I've

RE: watermarking

> > > >I'm a subscriber of PhotoShelter which sounds much like SmugMug. At > >least in allowing you to specify a watermark and them automatically > >putting on when you upload photos. > > > >Just this past week, I decided to go with a scanned copy of my > >signature as my watermark/copyright notice

Re: watermarking

what the scribble said - so if someone only saw one photo , they might have a hard time finding you. I know they would if I used MY signature! lol anyway, It seems I've been watermarking all along - but imbedding the signature in the actual file - I think I'll just make a copyright

Re: watermarking

Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: >On Mar 2, 2007, at 1:08 PM, ann sanfedele wrote: > > >>... I didn't think of watermarks as copyright info, though, just as >>something that would appear >>when someone tried to print you images and make them funky as a >>result. ... >> >> > > >I don't put the wat

Re: watermarking

Ann, I've been playing with different watermarks lately too. I'm a subscriber of PhotoShelter which sounds much like SmugMug. At least in allowing you to specify a watermark and them automatically putting on when you upload photos. Just this past week, I decided to go with a scanned copy of my si

Re: watermarking

On Mar 2, 2007, at 1:08 PM, ann sanfedele wrote: > ... I didn't think of watermarks as copyright info, though, just as > something that would appear > when someone tried to print you images and make them funky as a > result. ... I don't put the watermarks on my larger files to keep people fro

Re: watermarking

Acutually, I have been signing my images with copyrights on all the stuff I have previously put on the web - because the web images are not intended to be ones people print. what smugmug does is add a watermark to the images as seen on whatever galleries you ask them to watermark - but the wate

Re: watermarking

I've been putting watermarks on the larger versions of my image files in the PAW set for a while. An example can be seen here: http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/large/03-half.jpg That's actually little bolder/more intrusive than I would prefer, but putting in watermarks is fussy and

watermarking

So now I'm signed up on smugmug - when quickly uploaded my ashley calendar pics and chose smugmug watermark I got a large and too concealing "proof" across the center of the image... one is permitted to use one's own watermark which I figure I would like to just be my copyright very faint along t