Thanks Derby, these were pruned a lot (down from about 80) - the bright
sun photos were removed except for the one of Bride and Groom with
buildings..
I'm glad so many people I respect mostly liked what I pruned to and
now I'm getting some good feedback from the folks who were there.
ann
On
I don't know what you are talking about, Ann. These are really natural,
intimate photos, with some touching moments. The lighting is gentle and
NY as a backdrop can't be beat. Such great faces.
On 29/08/2013 1:28 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Pretty much a disaster - terrible light on the terr
Thanks Mark -
My wounds have healed somewhat.. :-)
But truly, I'm NOT doing any more weddings... stress city!
ann
On 9/2/2013 21:43, Mark C wrote:
I'm a little late coming to this Ann, but I think you have a lot of good
photos there. 16,18 and 33 stand out for me. I think you caught a lot of
g
I'm a little late coming to this Ann, but I think you have a lot of good
photos there. 16,18 and 33 stand out for me. I think you caught a lot of
good emotion, despite some of the technical flaws (e.g. the noisy
images). I only did 3 weddings nad never did get a good shot of bride
and groom doi
On 28/08/2013 9:28 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Pretty much a disaster - terrible light on the terrace
Fortunately there were a lot of people shooting - I'm glad I got my K5
paid for, but I would rather have not done the posed pics -
This is a small Geso - I feel ok about most of them - meaning
no
On 8/28/2013 11:28 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Pretty much a disaster - terrible light on the terrace
Fortunately there were a lot of people shooting - I'm glad I got my K5
paid for, but I would rather have not done the posed pics -
This is a small Geso - I feel ok about most of them - meaning
no
Ann, I do think that you're being too negative. I've looked at the
pictures you posted. There were few that I thought that the focus was
off, but beside that point - you conveyed the mood of the event and it
would seem to me it wasn't a big wedding, so that in a sense, you
needn't have to produ
thanks Christine, Paul, Stan, walt, darren, bob, Godders - you know, all
youse guys
sorry I'm so -um- so down... it combines with a couple of other things
at the moment.
I'll get back up soon - I've fallen but I CAN get up - just not as fast
as I ustah
Thanks everyone for holding me up
ann
On 8/28/2013 20:04, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Paul via phone
On Aug 28, 2013, at 6:15 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
On 8/28/2013 12:22, Stan Halpin wrote:
I see no issues with posing/composition. You weren't doing studio shots, but
rather capturing small slices of time in a dynamic (and fun!)
Hi Ann: I think you caught nice expressions--lots of great emotion. I think
you're being too negative. Very nice selection. Cheers, Christine
On Aug 28, 2013, at 10:28 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
>
> Pretty much a disaster - terrible light on the terrace
>
> Fortunately there were a lot of
Paul via phone
On Aug 28, 2013, at 6:15 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
>
>
> On 8/28/2013 12:22, Stan Halpin wrote:
>> I see no issues with posing/composition. You weren't doing studio shots, but
>> rather capturing small slices of time in a dynamic (and fun!) party. Your
>> friends should be pl
On 8/28/2013 12:37, Walt wrote:
I've shot about three weddings total in my life. And after every one of
them, I've experienced the exact same angst you're experiencing.
Then, I work on them a bit and go back through them, and still think
they're horrible.
Then, I go back through them a few da
On 8/28/2013 12:22, Stan Halpin wrote:
I see no issues with posing/composition. You weren't doing studio shots, but
rather capturing small slices of time in a dynamic (and fun!) party. Your
friends should be pleased with the results.
Two post-processing "issues" -
a. could be my monit
On 8/28/2013 12:08, Matthew Hunt wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
http://annsan.smugmug.com/Assignments/Paul-and-Linda-Get-Hitched/31453928_TSxSrg#!i=2724712337&k=x4jSmRR
Ann,
The outside photos look good to me. Some of the inside photos on the
second page loo
Darren -
this is the 20th wedding I've shot.. All the others were in film.
I deleted most of the posed photos.
everyone was late , we couldnt shoot where I planned to shoot and the
light ws horrible. I had 30 minutes at most. the groom directed
everything - trying to find a place on the terrac
Not a wedding masterpiece, for sure.
Still, there are really good ones.
I liked 10, 13 and 18, for example.
I have difficulty memorizing beyond 3 two-digit numbers, that is why ;)
Bulent
-
http://patoloji.gen.tr
http://celasun.wor
You did fine, Ann. You caught the enjoyment and celebration, and
that's the heart of it after all.
You even got a classic lens-hood-on-backwards shot in #12. :-)
Don't beat yourself up. You did really well with the outdoor shots
despite the terrace light. A few indoor shots are noticeably noisy,
Some very nice ones in there ... You captured the moments well. That's the
important thing for weddings.
Godfrey
On Aug 28, 2013, at 8:28 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
>
> Pretty much a disaster - terrible light on the terrace
>
> Fortunately there were a lot of people shooting - I'm glad I got
I've shot about three weddings total in my life. And after every one of
them, I've experienced the exact same angst you're experiencing.
Then, I work on them a bit and go back through them, and still think
they're horrible.
Then, I go back through them a few days later and see things that I c
Like the others, I think they look fine. I have respect for anyone
that shoots a wedding. It's to much stress for me. gs
George Sinos
www.GeorgesPhotos.net
www.GeorgeSinos.com
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Stan Halpin
wrote:
> I see no issues with posing/composition.
I see no issues with posing/composition. You weren't doing studio shots, but
rather capturing small slices of time in a dynamic (and fun!) party. Your
friends should be pleased with the results.
Two post-processing "issues" -
a. could be my monitor settings, but many of the earlier ones
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
> http://annsan.smugmug.com/Assignments/Paul-and-Linda-Get-Hitched/31453928_TSxSrg#!i=2724712337&k=x4jSmRR
Ann,
The outside photos look good to me. Some of the inside photos on the
second page look excessively noisy; even though the K-5 is
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:28:54AM -0400, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
>
> Pretty much a disaster - terrible light on the terrace
You should have ordered some overcast to be delivered.
>
> Fortunately there were a lot of people shooting - I'm glad I got my K5
> paid for, but I would rather have not don
The pictures are very nice. Love 29, 26, 19, 21 and numerous others. But, like
you, I hate shooting weddings and haven't done one in years now.
Enjoy your K-5!
Paul
On Aug 28, 2013, at 11:28 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
>
> Pretty much a disaster - terrible light on the terrace
>
> Fortunately t
Ann,
Don't be too hard on yourself.
Your pics look very spontaneous and unposed, not necessarily a bad thing.
"Posed" pics are difficult because they mean giving people directions
(and sometimes giving individuals directions in a group, which is
logistically more difficult).
Generally, my simple d
Works OK for me Ann. The people look good. :-) Regards, Bob S.
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
>
> Pretty much a disaster - terrible light on the terrace
>
> Fortunately there were a lot of people shooting - I'm glad I got my K5
> paid for, but I would rather have not do
Pretty much a disaster - terrible light on the terrace
Fortunately there were a lot of people shooting - I'm glad I got my K5
paid for, but I would rather have not done the posed pics -
This is a small Geso - I feel ok about most of them - meaning
not too embarrassing.
I had put 75 up to start
27 matches
Mail list logo
