Re: why So who would buy... (was:Special Interview with PENTAX @PMA)

2005-03-15 Thread Peter Lacus
Herb, if the body prevents me from getting shots that i earn my living from, it doesn't matter how good the glass is. there are lots of things that the *istD is good for, but there are lots that it can't do either, and those happen to be the ones that pay more because fewer people can reliably

Re: why So who would buy... (was:Special Interview with PENTAX @PMA)

2005-03-15 Thread Herb Chong
liably get them. Herb... - Original Message - From: "Peter Lacus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 10:38 AM Subject: why So who would buy... (was:Special Interview with PENTAX @PMA) i can go from a Digital Rebel to the 1Ds Mk2 without changing lens mo

Re: why So who would buy... (was:Special Interview with PENTAX @PMA)

2005-03-15 Thread Cotty
On 15/3/05, Peter Lacus, discombobulated, unleashed: >ok, looks it could be done. But one question still remains. Why? 2 reasons. 1 I was determined to be able to use old fashioned manual focus lenses on digital cameras 2 it was cheaper than buying equivalent Canon glass 3 because I could (

Re: why So who would buy... (was:Special Interview with PENTAX @PMA)

2005-03-15 Thread Cotty
On 15/3/05, Bill Owens, discombobulated, unleashed: >Because Pentax glass is superior to Canon glass. Insert 2 X 'some' in there and I would agree. Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com _

Re: why So who would buy...

2005-03-15 Thread Cotty
On 15/3/05, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed: >>Blasphemy and unnatural acts! Shame, Shame. > >Hey, those are two of Cotty's more appealing habits! You haven't seen what I do with 'those hobgoblins' Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=|http:

Re: why So who would buy...

2005-03-15 Thread Frantisek
>>Blasphemy and unnatural acts! Shame, Shame. MR> Hey, those are two of Cotty's more appealing habits! Or, rephrased: Cotty's more appealing habit is blasphemy and unnatural acts. No, Cotty's two more appealing habits are blasphemy, unnatural acts and surprise. Oh. Good light! fra

Re: why So who would buy... (was:Special Interview with PENTAX @PMA)

2005-03-15 Thread Peter Lacus
Bill Owens wrote: Because Pentax glass is superior to Canon glass. indeed it is (at least in the price levels I could afford, e.g. not counting Canon's L-glass), nevertheless such mixed system looks quite unbalanced to me. Bedo.

Re: why So who would buy... (was:Special Interview with PENTAX @PMA)

2005-03-15 Thread Bill Owens
Because Pentax glass is superior to Canon glass. Bill - Original Message - From: "Peter Lacus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 12:47 PM Subject: Re: why So who would buy... (was:Special Interview with PENTAX @PMA) Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote: yes

Re: why So who would buy... (was:Special Interview with PENTAX @PMA)

2005-03-15 Thread Peter Lacus
Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote: yes you can. But you can't go from a Pentax (D)SLR to the 1Ds Mk2 and use Pentax glass with it. This is very important to me, because I chose Pentax not because of their bodies, but because of their fine (and reasonably priced) glass. No, no, no! You are absolutely not rig

Re: why So who would buy...

2005-03-15 Thread Peter J. Alling
Mark Roberts wrote: "Peter J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote: http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/mods/eoskmount.html Blasphemy and unnatural acts! Shame, Shame. Hey, those are two of Cotty's more appealing habits! Ea. -- I can understand why man

Re: why So who would buy...

2005-03-15 Thread Mark Roberts
"Peter J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote: > >>http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/mods/eoskmount.html >> >Blasphemy and unnatural acts! Shame, Shame. Hey, those are two of Cotty's more appealing habits! -- Mark Roberts Photography and writing www.robertstech.com

Re: why So who would buy...

2005-03-15 Thread Sylwester Pietrzyk
Peter J. Alling wrote on 15.03.05 17:16: > Blasphemy and unnatural acts! Shame, Shame. Shame? As we used to say in Poland "Necessity is a mother of invention" ;-) -- Balance is the ultimate good... Best Regards Sylwek

Re: why So who would buy...

2005-03-15 Thread Peter J. Alling
Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote: Peter Lacus wrote on 15.03.05 16:38: yes you can. But you can't go from a Pentax (D)SLR to the 1Ds Mk2 and use Pentax glass with it. This is very important to me, because I chose Pentax not because of their bodies, but because of their fine (and reasonably priced) glass

Re: why So who would buy... (was:Special Interview with PENTAX @PMA)

2005-03-15 Thread Sylwester Pietrzyk
Peter Lacus wrote on 15.03.05 16:38: > yes you can. But you can't go from a Pentax (D)SLR to the 1Ds Mk2 and > use Pentax glass with it. This is very important to me, because I chose > Pentax not because of their bodies, but because of their fine (and > reasonably priced) glass. No, no, no! You ar

Re: why So who would buy... (was:Special Interview with PENTAX @PMA)

2005-03-15 Thread Cotty
On 15/3/05, Peter Lacus, discombobulated, unleashed: >> i can go from a Digital Rebel to the 1Ds Mk2 without changing lens mounts. > >yes you can. But you can't go from a Pentax (D)SLR to the 1Ds Mk2 and >use Pentax glass with it. This is very important to me, because I chose >Pentax not because

why So who would buy... (was:Special Interview with PENTAX @PMA)

2005-03-15 Thread Peter Lacus
Herb Chong wrote: i can go from a Digital Rebel to the 1Ds Mk2 without changing lens mounts. yes you can. But you can't go from a Pentax (D)SLR to the 1Ds Mk2 and use Pentax glass with it. This is very important to me, because I chose Pentax not because of their bodies, but because of their fine