On Sat, 6 Sep 2003, Steve Larson wrote:
> Didn`t want you to beat yourself up :)
I was not suggesting that, it was a personal observation.
> I did forget to mention
> to use DOF preview, the hood should come in more clearly.
Not available on the MZ-50 :-)
Kostas
- Original Message -
From: "Herb Chong"
Subject: Re: wide angle filter question
> have to be careful. some rings move the filter forward.
Thats why the next size up. If it's a really wide, like a 17 or 20mm, she
could even go to an 82mm step up. At this point, she co
have to be careful. some rings move the filter forward.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 10:38 AM
Subject: Re: wide angle filter question
> You could circumvent the
- Original Message -
From: "Amita Guha"
Subject: wide angle filter question
> Yesterday I picked up a standard Promaster 72mm UV filter to protect my
> new wide-angle lens. Then I went on the B&H site and I noticed that
> Tiffen makes filters specifically for w
On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, Amita Guha wrote:
> Is it critical to use a very thin filter on my 17mm lens? I want the
> front thread because I need to use a hood.
I noticed[1] that my K24/3.5 vignettes with the generic round hood
when using a filter (HMC Skylight). And that's a 24, not a 17. Does
your hoo
on 05.09.03 15:29, Amita Guha at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Yesterday I picked up a standard Promaster 72mm UV filter to protect my
> new wide-angle lens. Then I went on the B&H site and I noticed that
> Tiffen makes filters specifically for wide-angle lenses. These lenses
> are very thin and don'
6 matches
Mail list logo
