Re: [Pdns-users] External CNames

2010-03-05 Thread InterNetX - Marco Schrieck
Hello all, I checked this in with our PDNS if we have an external CNAME then we have to write the content with a dot in the end, for internal cnames this doen't work there you must write the content without a dot. Can anybody confirm this behaivor ? Regards Marco On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at

[Pdns-users] cache size and max-cache-entries

2010-03-05 Thread Fabien Seisen
Hi, i have some difficulties to understand what max-cache-entries means. I did some tests: - set max-cache-entries = 1 - send several queries (~1 000 000) - watch at rec_control get cache-entries And the number growed far beyond max-cache-entries . I dig a bit into the sources and it seems

Re: [Pdns-users] cache size and max-cache-entries

2010-03-05 Thread bert hubert
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 11:55:16AM +0100, Fabien Seisen wrote: i have some difficulties to understand what max-cache-entries means. Fabien, Which PowerDNS Recursor version did you test against? For a period of 5 minutes, in 3.1.7 you might see far higher numbers. This is addressed in 3.2.

Re: [Pdns-users] cache size and max-cache-entries

2010-03-05 Thread Fabien Seisen
2010/3/5 bert hubert bert.hub...@netherlabs.nl On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 11:55:16AM +0100, Fabien Seisen wrote: i have some difficulties to understand what max-cache-entries means. Fabien, Which PowerDNS Recursor version did you test against? For a period of 5 minutes, in 3.1.7 you might

Re: [Pdns-users] External CNames

2010-03-05 Thread bert hubert
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 11:04:16AM -0500, Ross Halliday wrote: We don't have PowerDNS rolled out here yet so I can't speak from experience, but it makes sense to me that PowerDNS might just regurgitate the contents of the record for a CNAME whereas everything else is processed internally,