On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 14:30 IHI IHI via Pdns-users <
pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com> wrote:
> Hello
> When upgrading to a new version(PowerDNS Recursor v4.7-->4.8-->4.9-->5),
> despite choosing to keep the current configuration file,but its tuning
> parameters at
> pdns-recursor.service(/lib/sy
On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 12:28 Tom Barrett via Pdns-users <
pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com> wrote:
> I would be interested in speaking with anyone who has experimented with
> customizing PowerDNS to support IPFS or the DNSLink TXT record type.
>
There’s not anything for PowerDNS to do here. They’
On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 10:47 lovi via Pdns-users <
pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Ive setup a pdns lab with 1 pdn/pgsql/master and a slave/named config.
>
> When I update a record pdns logs show that it takes about 40s before Ive
> this message :
> 1 domain for which we are
On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 8:17 AM Michael Loftis wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 8:15 AM Nicholas Williams via Pdns-users
> wrote:
> >
> > I thought domain names have supported unicode characters for several years
> > now.
>
> Not at the protocol level they&
On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 8:15 AM Nicholas Williams via Pdns-users
wrote:
>
> I thought domain names have supported unicode characters for several years
> now.
Not at the protocol level they're not. They're punycode.
>
> On Oct 30, 2020, at 7:53 AM, Frank Louwers wrote:
>
> Hi Nick,
>
> I gue
I was hoping someone who knew more about PDNS authoritative server
itself would chime in
For MySQL server+client, if the character set in the libmysqlclient
and server side tables/etc match, it doesn't matter except for server
side sorts (collations). If it is latin1 all the way through then
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 08:52 Tomasz Chmielewski via Pdns-users <
pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com> wrote:
> Unfortunately I'm not able to find what I'm doing wrong.
>
> The error is returned no matter if I have "master=yes" set in pdns.conf
> or not, and no matter if I use "masters": [] or not.
On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 07:01 Bjoern Franke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we have a zonefile which got recently added TXT entries for SPF and DMARC:
>
> _dmarc IN TXT "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:foo";
> IN MX 10 mx.domain.tld.
> IN TXT "v=s
(inline)
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 11:42 AM, Nicholas Williams
wrote:
> I'll look into that other script. Thanks, Bert.
>
>> How about a creating a separate sub-zone with a broken presigned DNSSEC
>
>> You can set presigned for just that single zone using the PRESIGNED domain
>> metadata[1] int your
, when you turn off recursive resolution it resolves. I
> can't figure out the missing part to have the same behavior.
> Le 3 janv. 2016 2:39 PM, "Michael Loftis" > a écrit :
>
>> Again not a resolver. Sorry but you're the one misunderstanding. If you
>>
sample output
> Le 3 janv. 2016 2:00 PM, "Aki Tuomi" > a écrit :
>
>> That is because dig is not a resolver.
>>
>>
>>
>> ---
>> Aki Tuomi
>>
>>
>> Original message ----
>> From: Luis Daniel Luci
the way u don't want to use. I know how.
>
> I need to make it work in non recursive mode.
> Le 3 janv. 2016 9:29 AM, "Aki Tuomi" > a écrit :
>
>> If you want to use auth as recursor, you need to configure
>>
>> recursor=
>> allow-r
PowerDNS is not the same as PowerDNS Recursor. The former only does
authoritative which is your problem here.
On Saturday, January 2, 2016, Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz <
luis.daniel.lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello
>
> Wat am I missing? I have this:
> launch=pipe,bind
> pipe-command=/usr/local/libexe
DNSSEC and DKIM.
On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Nick Williams
wrote:
> I'm upgrading to authoritative 3.4 and noticed that the records.content
> column has been increased from 255 characters to 64000 characters. Because
> my table is UTF-8, I get the following error:
>
> mysql> ALTER TABLE reco
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 9:55 AM, Brian Menges wrote:
> I’d say it’s on Toyota’s end:
>
>
Same here gslb-ns1.toyota-na.com not responding (Comcast, Seattle, WA)
___
Pdns-users mailing list
Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailm
eased March 2006.
>
> That said, if anybody does think a bug has been found in a recent
> PowerDNS, we're happy to look into it!
>
> Kind regards,
> --
> Peter van Dijk
> Netherlabs Computer Consulting BV - http://www.netherlabs.nl/
>
> On Dec 13, 2013, at 23:54
: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0
>
> ;; QUESTION SECTION:
> ;labisilon.lab.domain.com. IN A
>
> ;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
> lab.domain.com. 900 IN SOA pdns01.lab.domain.com. linuxadmins.domain.com.
> 2013073047 86400 7200 604800 3600
>
> ;; Query time: 0 msec
>
>
>
on.lab.domain.com. 900 IN A x.x.x.x
>
> ;; Query time: 2 msec
>
> Do I need to specifically add an “A” record of labisilon.lab.domain.com ->
> x.x.x.x?
> --
> Drew Decker
> Sent with Airmail
>
> On December 13, 2013 at 10:18:10 AM, Michae
time: 59 msec
I don’t believe the records are overlapping according to this output but
please correct me if I’m wrong on this.
--
Drew Decker
Sent with Airmail <http://airmailapp.com/tracking>
On December 13, 2013 at 12:35:02 AM, Michael Loftis
(mlof...@wgops.com)
wrote:
Is the delegated zone isilo
You're making several mistakes in setting up your delegation. First
you've included an SOA in your PowerDNS records. Start Of Authority
is exactly that. The etc zone needs to have only NS records and (if
necessary) A glue records inside of the delegating server. The PDNS
server is being given a
PowerDNS is database driven. Read the docs, or even just the features.
On Monday, July 22, 2013, Manish Rane wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> Wondering if I can edit/change the static zone file as a result of certain
> bash script. Since the backend is Mysql can we really pass mysql statement
> by which I
On Tuesday, June 25, 2013, Shamus Smith wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> thanks for all your answers, but I'm still stuck. Below is the full output
> for dig for pdns and dnsmasq.
> The query time is 2 ms for the first uncached request and 0 ms for pdns
> and dnsmasq. However, the
> whole execution of the
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Michael Loftis wrote:
>
>
> I don't think anything other than /etc/hosts should get involved but your
> stall pretty clearly appears to be happening during the resolution of the
> @localhost and not the round trip to the world and through
On Sunday, June 23, 2013, Shamus Smith wrote:
> Thanks for your answer. The full dig output was in the first posting.
> I have not modified nsswitch.conf and /etc/hosts contains only this:
>
No, only the +short is in any of your responses, when I say full output I
mean without +short - there's a
What about giving the full dig output too? My bet is you're actually
experiencing some sort of huge delay starting up dig or resolving
"localhost", use @127.0.0.1 instead and see if the time goes away.
Does your /etc/hosts contain 'localhost'? Have you modified your
nsswitch.conf? (Assuming stand
Its the CNAME - think of it like a symbolic link on a file system. It points
all access towards the given place. For your domain to work at all you'll need
to remove the yeetta.net CNAME.
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 10, 2013, at 7:28, Florus Both wrote:
> Hi, maybe someone can shed a light on
The recursor only ever talks to the authoritative ersolver in this
scneario so the authoritative resolver needs further configuration to
properly restrict who is being allowed to use it recursively.
recursor.conf only affects the recursor itself. You need to set, in
pdns.conf, allow-recursion to r
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 1:38 AM, Chris Russell
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> Quick question – is anyone on the list using PDNS in an ISP environment,
> especially for auth services ?
Up until a couple years ago I worked as Sr. SA/Ops Manager at Modwest,
we used PowerDNS then, and they still do today.
The recursive resolver is what clients talk to "locally". AKA a
caching resolver, it's not part of your authoritative infrastructure
at all. In fact, if you're using your authoritative nameservers as
caching resolvers, you should stop. For most people the recursive
resolver is provided by their
--On August 11, 2007 5:55:51 AM -0700 Augie Schwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I submitted a bug on this a while back:
http://wiki.powerdns.com/cgi-bin/trac.fcgi/ticket/125
And have been most recently lobbying (annoyingly at this point
probably) for a fix, but demand drives change, and ther
In the presence of a *.domain.com CNAME, 2.9.21, when asked for a more
specific A record responds appropriately with the A record when an A record
exists, and NOERROR/no answer for an MX or whatever. However, when asked
for an record, it will respond with the splat/*.domain.com CNAME
inst
--On November 18, 2006 11:27:26 AM -0800 Richard Vernooij
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I thought PRT record is the same? or do i misundertand. Can you please
explain the difference? and what must i do in my case?
I am going to assume you mean PTR record. PTR's really only occur in
.in-
32 matches
Mail list logo
