Re: [pdt-dev] Eclipse Helios SR1 releace candidate

2010-09-24 Thread Dave Kelsey
Just to let everyone know that I won't be contributing to PDT anymore. I have been involved in PDT even before the first official release, but now I feel it is time to say goodbye. All the best for the future. Dave Kelsey ___ pdt-dev mailing lis

Re: [pdt-dev] XDebug, remote debug and Eclipse editor file path

2009-09-07 Thread Dave Kelsey
This was addressed, but I can't remember if it got into PDT 2.0.1 or whether this was fixed in PDT 2.1. Are you on PDT 2.0.1 ? if not then you could try that. If you are then you will need to move to PDT 2.1 (Eclipse 3.5 Galileo). Regards Dave Kelsey pdt-dev-boun...@eclipse.org wrote on

RE: [pdt-dev] releases and branches

2009-08-26 Thread Dave Kelsey
Thanks Roy. Dave Kelsey ___ pdt-dev mailing list pdt-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev

[pdt-dev] releases and branches

2009-08-26 Thread Dave Kelsey
Which branches do each of the releases correspond to ? I am assuming HEAD is for the 2.2.0 release, but what about 2.1.2 ? Cheers Dave Kelsey ___ pdt-dev mailing list pdt-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev

RE: [pdt-dev] official release of maintenance for PDT 2.0

2009-04-30 Thread Dave Kelsey
+1 from me also for this. Thanks Dave Kelsey pdt-dev-boun...@eclipse.org wrote on 30/04/2009 05:31:05: > Thanks Nick! > > Since the last 4 integration builds of PDT 2.0.1 are identical, i.e. > nothing has been changed lately I think that we can say that people were > playing

[pdt-dev] official release of maintenance for PDT 2.0

2009-04-28 Thread Dave Kelsey
When is this planned ? It seems to have gone very quiet. I know there are some fixes released as integration builds but I could really use an official 2.0.1 release ? Regards Dave Kelsey Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with

Re: [pdt-dev] Question about debug.daemon plugin.

2009-01-06 Thread Dave Kelsey
Thanks for the response Michael, I will make the change, test it and commit it. Cheers Dave Kelsey pdt-dev-boun...@eclipse.org wrote on 06/01/2009 13:37:45: > The only reason for that IIRC was eliminating the need to load the PHP > stuff (debug plug-in has a dependency with PHP co

[pdt-dev] Question about debug.daemon plugin.

2009-01-06 Thread Dave Kelsey
have the debug.core plugin register an earlyStartup and remove the one from the debug.daemon plugin). I would like to get this change into PDT 2.0.1 as well. Cheers Dave Kelsey Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number

Re: [pdt-dev] errors in the nightly build

2008-08-10 Thread Dave Kelsey
Hi Roy, I have fixed the build breaks. Sorry about that was using Java 6, not Java 5. Dave Kelsey "Roy Ganor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/08/2008 13:57 Please respond to PDT Developers To "PDT Developers" cc Subject [pdt-dev] errors in

Re: [pdt-dev] PDT 2.0 and use of encodings for remote debug

2008-08-06 Thread Dave Kelsey
wire. It doesn't dictate the encoding to use to convert a php string to a java.lang.String. However I could use that preference specifically for that meaning within the xdebug environment. Best regards Dave Kelsey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/08/2008 15:03:24: > Hi, > 2008/8/6

Re: [pdt-dev] PDT 2.0 and use of encodings for remote debug

2008-08-06 Thread Dave Kelsey
up menu item in the variables view in a later step. transfer encoding remains the same but isn't used to decode php strings into java lang strings. Dave Kelsey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/08/2008 14:10:11: > > Hi, > 2008/8/6 Dave Kelsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >

Re: [pdt-dev] PDT 2.0 and use of encodings for remote debug

2008-08-06 Thread Dave Kelsey
? I don't think I will get around to solving 2, but I hope to solve 1 at least. Dave Kelsey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/08/2008 13:17:01: > > Hi, > > Output and Transfer encodings are only applied to variable and > output views. Besides that debug process should work as u

[pdt-dev] PDT 2.0 and use of encodings for remote debug

2008-08-06 Thread Dave Kelsey
d the opportunity to investigate it but it seems to me that the solution should be common for any installed debugger. regards Dave Kelsey Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Ha

RE: [pdt-dev] Confirm that HEAD is only branch currently for PDT 2.0

2008-07-30 Thread Dave Kelsey
Thanks Guy. Dave Kelsey "Guy Gurfinkel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 30/07/2008 15:43 Please respond to PDT Developers To "PDT Developers" cc Subject RE: [pdt-dev] Confirm that HEAD is only branch currently for PDT 2.0 Yes it

[pdt-dev] Confirm that HEAD is only branch currently for PDT 2.0

2008-07-30 Thread Dave Kelsey
I have quite a few code changes I want to check into PDT. This is the first stage of implementing a couple of new features and I just want to confirm that HEAD is currently the only branch at the moment for PDT 2.0 Cheers Dave Kelsey Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom

Re: [pdt-dev] Why does Eclipse/PDT insist on injecting my project name in the Run As.. PHP Web Page URL?

2008-07-08 Thread Dave Kelsey
There is an enhancement raised on bugzilla to allow the user to control whether the project gets appended to the URL when automatically generated. See https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=236971 Dave Kelsey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 08/07/2008 07:46:12: > I thought about that

RE: [pdt-dev] PDT 1.0.3 Delayed ?

2008-06-03 Thread Dave Kelsey
Thanks Guy. Dave Kelsey Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU ___ pdt-dev mailing list pdt

RE: [pdt-dev] PDT 1.0.3 Delayed ?

2008-06-03 Thread Dave Kelsey
xdebug correctly if xdebug version less than 2.0.2 I would like to see these fixes in the final 1.0.3 build if possible. Cheers Dave Kelsey "Guy Gurfinkel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/06/2008 08:54 Please respond to PDT Developers To "PDT Develo

[pdt-dev] PDT 1.0.3 Delayed ?

2008-05-31 Thread Dave Kelsey
nsure the enhancements and fixes I have committed are present) and also the process for getting fixes in (if necessary) and a new build created as I still don't know what process you follow ? Thanks Dave Kelsey Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered

Re: [pdt-dev] Move to SVN

2008-04-02 Thread Dave Kelsey
Hi Alon, there was a post by Yaron regarding 1.1, and I infered from this that 1.1 was moving to SVN. I see that there was an announcement for all projects to move to SVN, I was wondering if 1.0.x was also going to be moved. Regards Dave Kelsey (post by Yaron

[pdt-dev] Move to SVN

2008-04-02 Thread Dave Kelsey
I gather from an old posting that PDT 1.1 is now hosted on SVN. Is PDT 1.0.x going to be hosted on SVN as well ? Cheers Dave Kelsey Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour

RE: [pdt-dev] Can't get PDT to Debug PHP scripts on Win32 using xdebug

2008-02-01 Thread Dave Kelsey
being labeled as 1.0.2 builds. Basically look at the release builds for the official version releases. If there is a stable build with a newer release date then this is likely to be a milestone build for the next official release. Dave Kelsey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 01/02/2008 14:32:15: >

Re: [pdt-dev] Can't get PDT to Debug PHP scripts on Win32 using xdebug

2008-01-31 Thread Dave Kelsey
your php.ini to generate a log. Cheers Dave Kelsey Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU ___

Re: [pdt-dev] schedule for the 1.0.x stream

2008-01-15 Thread Dave Kelsey
It looks like a fix I put in has been backed out in the latest revision of this branch. Can someone send me this build ? I would like to do some testing as well ? Regards Dave Kelsey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 15/01/2008 08:09:36: > The build is based on tag v20080102 > > Regard

RE: [pdt-dev] schedule for the 1.0.x stream

2008-01-14 Thread Dave Kelsey
Assaf, what date was the build taken from ? I would like to check to ensure that all the fixes I put into the 1.0.2 stream will be present. Thanks Dave Kelsey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 14/01/2008 16:45:55: > Hi Dave, > > Sorry for the late response, here is our schedule: >

RE: [pdt-dev] schedule for the 1.0.x stream

2008-01-14 Thread Dave Kelsey
Thanks Assaf. That's great. Dave Kelsey Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU ___ pd

[pdt-dev] schedule for the 1.0.x stream

2008-01-14 Thread Dave Kelsey
know the specific date). Many thanks Dave Kelsey Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU __

[pdt-dev] scheduled release of 1.0.2

2008-01-13 Thread Dave Kelsey
Hi, is 1.0.2 still on schedule to be released on 16th Jan ? Cheers Dave Kelsey Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU

RE: [pdt-dev] confirm which branch is for the 1.0.2 official release

2008-01-02 Thread Dave Kelsey
for editing and debugging ? Currently XDebug support doesn't work with linked files and folders so I was wondering what the PDT requirements were in this area. Cheers Dave Kelsey Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with n

[pdt-dev] confirm which branch is for the 1.0.2 official release

2007-12-28 Thread Dave Kelsey
Can I assume that the HEAD branch is now the correct branch to add fixes for the 1.0.2 release due in January ? Many thanks Dave Kelsey Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North