Inquiry Blog
http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2015/01/30/peirces-1880-algebra-of-logic-chapter-3-%E2%80%A2-preliminaries/
http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2015/02/01/peirces-1880-algebra-of-logic-chapter-3-%E2%80%A2-selection-1/
http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2015/02/03/peirces-1880-algebra-of-logic-chap
Helmut, List,
Descriptive semiotics is always available for describing whatever
manner of free associations and personal connotations might chance
to pass through a given interpreter's head or external expressions,
but logic conceived as normative semiotics is an inquiry oriented
toward more foca
List, Jon:
If read from a technical perspective, this passage (CP 3.220) can be
interpreted as nearly self-contradictory or utterly ambiguous. It appears that
CSP is unable to distinguish between nouns as Proper Nouns and nouns as
generals. But this can be a perplex gloss.
Contrast:
> Every re
Thanks Jon.
I put integers to each of the nine dual relatives in the first three columns
and rows. (in Bold print) I then rotated the block left 90 degrees three
times. Crease the diagonals <357> <753>, tack down the 4 corners <>, and
pull the apex <> straight up into a pyramid. Vo
Jon, List,
I was thinking of comparing the sentence "C thanks A for B" with a square root: The square root of a positive number has either a positive or a negative result (or is it both?). And, that C is thankful is also only one possibility of result: C might also not like B and reject it, or mi
Gary F, Jeff, lists,
I agree that Jeff's quotes are well worth reflecting on in connection with
NP. While I know them rather well, I must admit that I hadn't seen, or at
least didn't remember, the quotation you provided, hidden, as it were, in a
note at the back of EP2. As you remarked, the passag
List,
While we're waiting for the Natural Propositions seminar to recommence,
I thought I'd send this on an oddity that I've found. I think I've
mentioned at peirce-l in the past that I couldn't track down a certain
correction that Peirce made to a graph in "Prolegomena" - I don't mean
Peirc
Post : Peirce's 1880 “Algebra Of Logic” Chapter 3 • Selection 4
http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2015/02/12/peirces-1880-algebra-of-logic-chapter-3-%e2%80%a2-selection-4/
Posted : February 12, 2015 at 4:00 pm
Chapter 3. The Logic of Relatives (cont.)
§2. Relatives (cont.)
220. Every relative
