[PEIRCE-L] Re: Abduction, Deduction, Induction, Analogy, Inquiry

List, Stephen: > > On 2/26/2016 5:38 PM, Stephen C. Rose wrote: > > I see abduction as guessing (and approved by CP), induction as having some > > evidence but less than deduction which is fallible but the best we can do > > to prove something. I have been cautioned against writing brief notes to

[PEIRCE-L] Re: Abduction, Deduction, Induction, Analogy, Inquiry

Post : Abduction, Deduction, Induction, Analogy, Inquiry : 4 http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2016/02/26/abduction-deduction-induction-analogy-inquiry-4/ Date : February 26, 2016 at 9:00 am Re: Facebook Discussion on The Ecology of Systems Thinking • https://www.facebook.com/groups/774241602654986/p

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Relevance in context

oops, forgot this paragraph: "We produced the above working hypothesis by stating the topic, contrast-class and relevance relation [21] explicitly. The logarithmic spiral played different roles during the procedural st

[PEIRCE-L] Re: Abduction, Deduction, Induction, Analogy, Inquiry

Stephen, List, I like messages that are medium-sized myself ... I'm sure I've spent more time over the last 49 years justifying the ways of Peirce to people who scarcely knew his name much less the thrust of his work but some of the issues he raised from infancy so many years ago have popped up

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Relevance in context

Hi Gary f and list! Here are some quotes direct from Promoting convergence: the phi spiral in abduction of mouse corneal behaviors: “Sufficient explanations are three-term relations between a topic, a contrast-class, and a relevance relation, which “specifies what sort of thing is being requested

[PEIRCE-L] Relevance in context

A post from my blog aftersigns, http://gnusystems.ca/wp/2016/02/relevance-in-context/: Sperber and Wilson (1995, 142) suggest that the goal of the comprehension process is [[ to maximize the relevance of any information being processed. . people hope that the assumption being processed is rel