Hi Soren,
EP 2: 463.
Best,
Jerry
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 5:23 PM, Søren Brier wrote:
> Where can I find Peirce’s: *An Essay toward Improving our Reasoning in
> Security and Liberty*, from 1913??
>
>
>
> Best
>
> Søren
>
>
>
> *From:* Jerry Rhee
Saying reality is all does not mean everything is real. A unicorn is real
only because of the role he or she plays in reality. Reality has no borders
-- it is everything. Without an everything to designate with a word we are
prey to binary or dualistic thinking which might be fine for some things
Clark, List:
Right, that ambiguity surfaces in the two sentences that I initially
mentioned a few days ago.
- A unicorn has one horn.
- Unicorns are real.
The object of "unicorn" in the first sentence is the *idea *of a unicorn,
and that is what makes it true, along with the fact that a
> On Feb 14, 2017, at 12:04 PM, Jon Alan Schmidt
> wrote:
>
> A Replica of the word "unicorn" is thus a Rhematic Indexical Sinsign that
> calls up the idea of a unicorn because, although no unicorn really exists,
> real descriptions of the unicorn are well known to
Ben, Clark, List:
Peirce's comments about the phoenix do indeed seem relevant to the unicorn
example and the nature of labels in general.
CSP: A Rhematic Symbol or Symbolic Rheme is a sign connected with its
Object by an association of general ideas in such a way that its Replica
calls up an
Clark, list,
I haven't read very much on the problem of reference and generality with
respect to fictional characters, so I'm reluctant to say that it usually
comes down to equivocation over terms. Also I have in mind Peirce's
comment, I don't remember where, that the object determines the
Clark, list,
Yes, the different kinds of universe of discourse is indeed a "tricky
bit" as you put it. If the sign's object is ultimately the universe of
which the special object is a member, or part, then is there any reason
for the sign not to be the universe of signs of which the special