The first thing about intelligence is knowing what games you want to play ...
or whether to play at all.
I'm not seeing any AIs that I yet.
Regards,
Jon
http://inquiryintoinquiry.com
> On Jun 13, 2017, at 8:21 PM, wrote:
>
> John, you've made several important points here, and thanks esp
John, you've made several important points here, and thanks especially for
taking Jerry C's question off my hands. š
A note about AI ā¦ back in the 1970s I played go quite a bit and got reasonably
good at it. At that time, chess-playing programs were just beginning to reach
the higher levels
Gary F, Jerry LRC, and Jerry R,
GF
Computability is not the core issue, when you define logic
pragmatically as āthe science of the laws of the stable
establishment of beliefsā (CP 3.429).
When you use the term "pragmatically", the issues of how that stable
establishment can be achieved in a fi
Robert, all ...
There is also a discussion of Peirce's Law in the article I wrote
on Logical Graphs, a topological variant of Peirce's Alpha Graphs
I developed in the process of programming a propositional modeler.
Here is the InterSciWiki copy:
Logical Graph (ISW)
http://intersci.ss.uci.edu/wi
Dear list:
h, I like where this conversation is headed, for you cannot have this
conversation without ultimately lighting on syllogism. :)
Best,
J
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 1:14 PM, Jerry LR Chandler <
jerry_lr_chand...@icloud.com> wrote:
> Gary:
>
> On Jun 13, 2017, at 1:02 PM, g...@gnusyst
Gary:
> On Jun 13, 2017, at 1:02 PM, g...@gnusystems.ca wrote:
>
> but as Peirce always said, logic is a positive science while mathematics is
> not. Computability is not the core issue, when you define logic pragmatically
> as āthe science of the laws of the stable establishment of beliefsā (C
John, you wrote
āLogicians from Aristotle to Peirce to the present use the *semantic* criterion
of preserving truth to justify their *syntactic* rules.ā
Yes, this is crucial! You canāt do formal logic without mathematics, but as
Peirce always said, logic is a positive science while mathemati
Jon,
You said that in an earlier note, and I corrected it:
The just-so-story that relative terms got their meanings by blanking out
pieces of meaningful clauses or phrases, along with the analogies to
polyunsaturated chemical valences... They tempt one to confuse the
syntactic accidents used
Jon A., List:
JA: As I am realizing more and more in recent years, analyzing and
classifying signs as a substitute for analyzing and classifying objects is
the first slip of a slide into nominalism, namely, the idea that the
essence or reality of objects is contained in the signs we use to descri
Dear Edwina et al,
Regarding your first point. Edwina: "If I understand you correctly, you
are suggesting that 'empathy', as a societal characteristic, i.e., a
habit/Thirdness within a population, might be removed from that
population's behaviour. Such a population, I suggest, couldn't last be
Jon and Jerry,
To specify a system of formal logic, there are many equivalent
options for choosing the notation, the operators, the definitions,
the axioms, and the rules of inference.
JA
One could hardly dispute the importance of implication relations
like A ā B. The set-theoretic analogues a
Post : The Difference That Makes A Difference That Peirce Makes : 9
http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2017/06/13/the-difference-that-makes-a-difference-that-peirce-makes-9/
Peircers,
I took some pains to trace the threads on rhemes, rhemata, etc. back before
the U.S. holiday disruptions and the home
12 matches
Mail list logo
