Re: [PEIRCE-L] The final interpretant

Auke, List: JAS: Peirce consistently maintains that there are exactly three interpretants. AvB: This sentence most certainly is not true. Please provide a citation or quote where Peirce assigns specific names to more than three interpretants in the same passage. Unless you can do that, I sta

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Peirce's Conception of God (was Categories at work within the signs)

Auke, List: AvB: I will not respond to the content of your words since my aim was not to start a discussion about religion. Understood, although I consider the subject matter of my previous post to be metaphysics rather than religion. AvB: By the way, I like this one most: I will simply poi

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Categories at work within the signs

I haven’t been following this thread (or group of threads) closely, but I noticed that in the discussion of the ‘hexad’ there’s been a call for more concrete examples, an interest in biological applications, and a question about the linearity of the “order of determination,” especially in regard

Re: [PEIRCE-L] The final interpretant

Jon, You wrote: Peirce consistently maintains that there are exactly three interpretants. - This sentence most certainly is not true. In the alpha part of semiotics it may seem so, but not in the beta part (see my other mail) where he deals with the interprtetation of the sign. lets do the c

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Peirce's Conception of God (was Categories at work within the signs)

Jon Alan, Thanks for your response. I will not respond to the content of your words since my aim was not to start a discussion about religion. In general I skip mails on the list on that subject. But by our communication on semiotics being in a cul-de-sac kind of state I started wondering if th

[PEIRCE-L] Re: Affinities between classes of signs according to CSP vs Marty's Lattice (proof by video 26 sec)

New more demonstrative video ; the same but with four limited downtime ... https://www.youtube.com/tL29hqNfFlg Regards Le sam. 18 avr. 2020 à 22:10, robert marty a écrit : > I have always maintained that the lattice of the 10 classes of signs is