Jon, Robert, List,
JAS: Overall, we seem to be more or less on the same page.
GR: I think that's so.
JAS: I understand the impetus for using "presupposition" rather than
"involution," since the former term is more familiar to modern
mathematicians and logicians than the latter.
GR: I too
BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;
}JAS, list
I think I'll follow Peirce's outline, which asserts that the
qualisign is a Sign. As he wrote,
"Signs are divisible by three trichotomies; first, according as the
sign in itself is a mere
Gary R., Robert, List:
Overall, we seem to be more or less on the same page.
I understand the impetus for using "presupposition" rather than
"involution," since the former term is more familiar to modern
mathematicians and logicians than the latter.
I have no objection to saying that 3ns
Gary R., List:
I would say that the color of the paint chip is a tone that inheres in a
token, not a quality that *in itself* is a sign. The paint chip is
certainly not a pure icon, as a qualisign would have to be, since it is
also an index of the paint that the shopper intends to buy. In that
Robert, List,
Robert wrote:
RM: I spent a year extracting all the definitions of the sign that Peirce
could have imagined and I was not disappointed since I found 76; they're on
peirce.org. I have taken this effort when I realized the incredible number
of scholars who thought in a non-critical
Helmut,
I've been trying to get back to your message of 4/12/2020
under the subject line "Categories and Speculative Grammar",
but I'll reply under Robert's original subject line as the
profusion of titles has been derailing my train of thought.
Some of the material you allude to below has gone
BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;
}Robert - thank you so much for your '76 definitions of the Sign'.
It's an excellent source - As you say- there are 'impossible
triangles and confusions'. Your list of what Peirce actually mean by
the sign-as-a- triad - is
Gary, Jon Alan, List
I fully respect yours concerns and of course it is clear that everyone can
invest them in the podium that is quite honored. For the part concerning me
I see no difficulty in using "involution" rather than "presupposition" and
I do not think I have strayed too far from Peirce
