We confirm that the 7th edition of the World Congress on the Square of
Opposition will take place in Leuven, Belgium, September, 16-20, 2020.
Extended Deadline to send a one page abstract is May 31.
Organizing Committee - SQUARE 2020
https://www.square-of-opposition.org/
Gary, Jon Alan, Jon Awbrey, List
*1 *-First I note that the formulation "3ns involves 2ns, which involves
1ns" is very dangerous car it forgets that 2ns has its autonomy and 1ns
too. If you look at the podium on remains in the inner cylinder. It seems
to me that Peirce's reproach to Hegel is:
"*H
To JAS:
I wish to inquire into the older seeming use of colors themselves as signs.
For example, the color of roses given as a gift to a woman by a man has
different meanings. Red= love or passion. See this link for the meaning of
rose colors.
https://www.dgreetings.com/valentine-love/meaning-of-
Robert, All ...
Re: https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/arc/peirce-l/2020-05/msg00054.html
As it happens, I've been working on a comment about your first point below
but I'll post it back on your original thread, when and if I manage to put
it in respectable shape, since I'm finding this welter of indi
Jon, List,
Thank you, Jon! I do have to say, that have had a concept of composition, of which Robert and Jon A.S. said it is not good, and it rather is all about determination and correlates. The concept of composition was, that a secondness would consist of two, and a thirdness of three parts,
BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;
}Robert, list
Thanks for this post - which is delightful. First - a few comments:
I very much agree that Peircean semiosis is relational and feel that
this requirement for interactional networking tends to
Re: > Does there exist a text for dummies?
Once I was a dummy ...
and then I read Peirce's 1870 Logic Of Relatives ...
• https://oeis.org/wiki/Peirce%27s_1870_Logic_Of_Relatives_%E2%80%A2_Overview
and I gradually became ... long time passing ... slightly less of a dummy ...
There's a lot in P
Jon, List,
Thank you! It will take some time for me to read and understand your wikipedia text, about the time it takes you to write 100 more texts. People have different capacities, I am looking forward to next life. Buuut, every effort will pay off, somehow, somewhen, and be it in the next li
I do not see how we can talk here about an operative relationship that
would be a triad relationship. It is not anything other than the
composition of two morphisms and I do not ask for more. 3,2 and 1 are the
"place names," and "involves" are arrow names that I usually call alpha and
beta. Now i
Edwina, List
I've been a repentant smoker for 40 years! On the other hand given the lack
of criticism after 3 days of offering on the market of my "nicotine" I
wonder if colleagues are all smokers or all non-smokers. I see you liked
it but I don't know how to make such technical cartoons; I'm jus
BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;
}Robert - Don't worry- I'm not going to get into a scenario of
flinging quotations at you! Such actions in my view, don't accomplish
a thing - They just set up non-dialogical Security Walls where we hide
behind the quotatio
Edwina, List:
Peirce did not have *only one* outline. He used qualisign/sinsign/legisign
in 1903, but by 1906 he had switched to tone/token/type, and in 1908 he
suggested potisign/actisign/famisign. I understand that his 1903 taxonomy
has turned out to be especially *useful *in many applications
Ben N., List:
Thank you for providing another example to discuss. As I have acknowledged
before, my brain seems to be wired for abstract thinking, but I am well
aware of the importance and value of examining concrete applications; I
just struggle to come up with them myself. I also want to point
BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;
}JAS -
I think it's irrelevant whether we call the
Qualisign/Sinsign/Legisign ...tone/token/type...and so on. I'm not
sure why you consider it important.
As for your rejection of my using modern terminol
Gary R., Robert, List:
I take no exception to anything in Gary R.'s reply, and in light of his and
Robert's comments along with Jon A.'s remark in the other thread, I am now
persuaded to embrace the formulation that 3ns involves 2ns and 1ns, while
2ns involves 1ns. However, I would welcome some
Helmut, List:
What helped me first come to understand how a linear series of N
trichotomies results in a total of (N+1)(N+2)/2 classes of signs was the
attached diagram that appears on p. 46 of John K. Sheriff's 1994 book, *Charles
Peirce's Guess at the Riddle: Grounds for Human Significance*. T
Robert, Jon A., List:
In CP 2.318 (1903), Peirce is discussing "the question whether every
proposition has a Subject and a Predicate," and only brings up
tricoexistence in the specific case of a *copulative *proposition.
CSP: It predicates the genuinely Triadic relation of *tricoexistence*, "P
a
Edwina, List:
I explicitly *did not* reject "using modern terminology to refer to
the Peircean framework." What I reject is using Peirce's *own *terminology
in a way that is inconsistent with *his *usage thereof in most or all of
his writings. In my view, that straightforwardly violates his clea
18 matches
Mail list logo
