Gary R, Jon AS, and Robert,
There are many ways of thinking, and
no method is ideal for all purposes. But when trying to understand what
Peirce wrote, it's essential to interpret his words according to his way
of thinking.
GR> I must immediately add that I do not see Jon as
distorting Peirce's
BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px; }I
don't think that Robert's contribution can be reduced to just the
podium; I appreciated some other issues.
1] I think he was reminding us that our knowledge base [Thirdness]
is developed, learned, adaptive [and
Robert:
After following these exchanges, I remain deeply troubled by the tone of the
messages that are offered in the views of CSP’s logic, semantics and
mathematics.
Other obligations restrict my participation. Nevertheless, at least a simple
comment should offer some deep reservations about
