Jerry LRC,
In logic, the statement "p is equivalent to
q" is a synonym for "p iff q", which is a synonym for
"(if p then q) and (if q then p)". That is the relation that
Peirce intended when he said that the scroll is equivalent to a nest of
two negations.
In mathematics, there is an open-ende
John, List, All:
Thanks for sharing the first part of your draft article.
JFS: As a result, they [Peirce and Frege] made a mistake in drawing a
sharp distinction between logic as a theory and logic as a calculus.
The fact that you happen to disagree with them does not entail that they
"made a
Jeffrey, John , list
I'd agree with you both, that not all logical models are triadic,
since indeed, monadic and dyadic relations can be graphed. Is a
logical model only about true and false?
My point was only about the semiosic function itself, which is, as
an argument
Jeff, List:
Indeed, many of the relations that are symbolically (i.e.,
triadically) *represented
*by names in EG (as well as GrIn and SG) are monadic or dyadic, as
iconically signified by their having only one or two lines of identity
attached to them. However, every aspect of EG *itself *is triad
