Jon,
I appreciate your comments, even though they disagree with what I believe
Peirce intended. But I can see that I need to respond to the questions you
raise in the article I'm writing.
JAS> In the RLT example, what is written outside the "lightly drawn oval" does
not govern what is
John, List:
JFS: The word 'paper' is the same word that he used in R514 for a paper
with postulates in the margin that govern the graphs inside a red line.
Actually, Peirce *does not* use the word "paper" in the "red pencil"
passage of R 514, he uses the word "sheet." However, this is just a
Jon, List,
Please note the phrase "a special understanding between utterer and
interpreter" in the excerpt below. And note that different "papers" of the
phemic sheet may have different special understandings. Although Peirce did
not coin the term 'metalanguage', that is the word that has
John, List:
I had an epiphany of sorts while I was initially drafting this reply. For
now, I will just respond to a few specific points, but in a later post, I
intend to propose a way forward for Delta EGs that could be truly
collaborative instead of competitive--both/and, not either/or.
JFS:
Jon, Jerry, List,
My previous notes cited many references, and I doubt that people will read them
all (any?).
But I presented some slides at a conference on Knowledge Graphs in May of 2020
(via Zoom because of covid), which I extended in July for a keynote talk at the
European Semantic Web
