Clark, list,
I don't know whether (A) Peirce would put all applied cenoscopy (applied
_/philosophia prima/_) into Science of Review or whether (B),for Peirce,
some of it could be cenoscopy applied in physics, cenoscopy applied in
psychology, etc. (B) seems much likelier to me. There's philosop
> On Oct 29, 2015, at 11:52 AM, Jeffrey Brian Downard
> wrote:
>
> The temptation of importing conceptions from the normative sciences into our
> examination of the elements that are fundamental for analyzing the
> observations that are the data for this theory is, I believe, a great danger.
Quick note, just to be clear: 'a revised table of the taxa' refers to my
revising myself to add some lines of division. The only revision to
Peirce is the showing of two cycles, he didn't mention such cycles. Also
I've reinserted in Jeff D.'s response the horizontal line that I put
between the
Ben, Gary R., Clark, List,
Ben has offered two things that are quite helpful to me for the purposes of
thinking more clearly about the relationships that hold between math,
phenomenology and the normative sciences.
First, he has pointed out that Kant's remark to the effect "That philosophy
w
