Vehkavaara [mailto:tommi.vehkava...@uta.fi]
Sent: April 27, 2015 10:58 AM
To: peirce-l at list.iupui.edu
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Re: [biosemiotics:8465] Re: Natural Propositions
Jerry, You wrote (26 Apr 2015 17:14:19)
More specifically, consider CSP's letter to Lady Welby, p. 7, Oct. 12, 1904
Dear Tommi, lists
You're right, the correct quote is:
Secondness is the mode of being of that which is such as it is, with respect
to a second but regardless of any third (8.328)
Best
F
-
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on Reply List or Reply All to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L
Frederik, List:
From the perspective of the chemical sciences, I find your strong conclusions
to be questionable.
More specifically, consider CSP's letter to Lady Welby, p. 7, Oct. 12, 1904.
and his clear distinction between Firstness and Secondness.
Secondness is that mode of being of that
