BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;
}John, list
That's exactly my point - as you say: "Any ontology that is not
designed for some purpose or intention
has no purpose"
My view is that those who focus on this examination to the
exclusion o
John, list,
You said:
‘Any ontology that is not designed for some purpose or intention has no
purpose.’
I must then ask:
Why do you say,
‘The conclusion that a Seme could be a subject is not just false, it is
horribly false.
It contradicts and undermines Peirce's entire system of semeio
Pat C, Matthew, Phil M, and Jon A,
Basic issue: How do we determine whether two things that we
experience on different occasions (or that we describe in
different ways) are "the same"?
For example, suppose we describe something as a vase, and somebody
else describes it as a lump of clay. Are t
