Inquiry Blog
http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2015/12/08/relations-their-relatives-16/
http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2015/12/10/relations-their-relatives-17/
http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2015/12/12/relations-their-relatives-18/
http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2015/12/22/relations-their-relatives-19/
Supplement: I think, in my below text there are a lot of mistakes: I mixed up tuples with products, I am not sure when to use round and when winged brackets, and the set of unordered triples does not consist of three, but of six sets of ordered ones, and I dont know what else. I must read
Jon, list,
about ordered and unordered pairs: In the mathematical books I had read in, there was only the way of writing ordered pairs. And symmetry was only explained by the example of a subset of a product of two same sets (A x A). I had thought then, if you have two different sets, A and B,
Inquiry Blog
http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2015/12/08/relations-their-relatives-16/
http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2015/12/10/relations-their-relatives-17/
http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2015/12/12/relations-their-relatives-18/
Peirce List
Supplement: I suspect, that my below consideration is non-Peircean, as far as I know, because I ony know examples by Peirce, that are about relatives, that is terms, i.e. language. Language, of course, can only be inter-subjective. An intra-subjective consideration as below may be weird or
Jon, List,
Thank you. I am happy, that I now am more or less clear about the difference eg. between relation and relative term, and general and elementary. I find it complicated to apply the mathematical relation concept to realworld situations. There seem to be relations (and relative terms) of
Inquiry Blog
http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2015/12/08/relations-their-relatives-16/
http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2015/12/10/relations-their-relatives-17/
Peirce List
JA:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/17890
Peirce List:
JA:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/17890
GF:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/17894
JBD:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/17902
JA:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/17907
topic this year for the
Biosemiotics Gathering is Are genes signs and if so what are they signs of?
Cheers,
John
-Original Message-
From: Jon Awbrey [mailto:jawb...@att.net]
Sent: March 5, 2015 2:01 PM
To: John Collier; Helmut Raulien; Peirce List
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Re: Relations
Inquiry Blog
• http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2015/02/17/relations-their-relatives-1/
• http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2015/02/17/relations-their-relatives-2/
• http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2015/02/18/relations-their-relatives-3/
Peirce List
List, Jon
Your post wrt Number Theory is very revealing concerning the origins of your
beliefs with respect to matter / material world / reality in contrast to the
world of perceptions, thoughts about the world out-there. Can it be
re-evaluated from an alternative perspective of the notion
Inquiry Blog
• http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2015/02/17/relations-their-relatives-1/
• http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2015/02/17/relations-their-relatives-2/
• http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2015/02/18/relations-their-relatives-3/
Peirce List
Thread:
JA:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/15704
Peircers,
It may help to clarify the relationship between logical relatives
and mathematical relations. The word “relative” as used in logic
is short for “relative term” — as such it refers to an article of
language
13 matches
Mail list logo
