Re: Aw: Re: Re: Re: [PEIRCE-L] semantic problem with the term

2017-03-31 Thread Edwina Taborsky
Helmut - a concept can be formed by an individual. It doesn't have to be formed by a group. The concept that the two people are using is a dynamic object. Yes, their interaction, if there are two people discussing a common concept, connects them to the wider community. Edwina

Aw: Re: Re: Re: [PEIRCE-L] semantic problem with the term

2017-03-31 Thread Helmut Raulien
Edwina, The immediate interpretant is internal, but a concept is formed by a society, which the individuals are parts of. So perhaps they have access to what is internal of the society? I mean, when eg. two individuals talk about a common concept, this talk automatically makes them parts of the c

Re: Aw: Re: Re: Re: [PEIRCE-L] semantic problem with the term

2017-03-27 Thread Jerry Rhee
Dear list: rather ironic that the ultimate, immutable aim- the one that should accord with a free development of the agent's own esthetic quality- takes on the form of a carrot, no? Best, Jerry R On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 12:36 PM, Claudio Guerri wrote: > Mein lieber Helmut, List, > again answer

Re: Aw: Re: Re: Re: [PEIRCE-L] semantic problem with the term

2017-03-27 Thread Claudio Guerri
Mein lieber Helmut, List, again answer between the lines with >>> (this was taught to me by T.A.Sebeok just at the beginning of e-mails) Helmut Raulien escribió el 27/03/2017 a las 13:14: Claudio, List, So it is a bit paradoxical: On one hand we should be aware, that we are carrot-chasing donk

Aw: Re: Re: Re: [PEIRCE-L] semantic problem with the term

2017-03-27 Thread Helmut Raulien
Claudio, List,  So it is a bit paradoxical: On one hand we should be aware, that we are carrot-chasing donkeys, on the other hand we should not abandon the carrot chasing projects, inquiry. And we must respect other donkeys who are chasing different carrots. And, for not thinking that there are a