system that is a lot easier to use.
John
From: Benjamin Udell [mailto:bud...@nyc.rr.com]
Sent: January 31, 2015 8:45 PM
To: John Collier; biosemiot...@lists.ut.ee; peirce-l@list.iupui.edu
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Re: [biosemiotics:8047] Re: Triadic Relations
John C., Gary F.,
Well, clearly I'
John C., Gary F.,
Well, clearly I'm not familiar enough with Putnam's argument.
As regards different directions of determination as 'constraint', it
might be sufficient to distinguish level from meta-level. If a given
object always has a certain index accompanying it, by which people
usually
John C., Gary F., lists,
Whew, I don't like to write posts where I figure I'm wearying people by
trying to fill in gaps that I discern in my previous posts. But here goes -
I should add that, if the brain in a vat faces only a practical
impossibility, not a theoretical impossibility, of disco
Comments intertwined. Thanks for the effort, but it doesn’t really help with
what is worrying me.
From: Benjamin Udell [mailto:bud...@nyc.rr.com]
Sent: January 31, 2015 7:08 PM
To: biosemiot...@lists.ut.ee; peirce-l@list.iupui.edu
Subject: [PEIRCE-L] Re: [biosemiotics:8047] Re: Triadic Relations
