One last point. I think a final place where Derrida follows Peirce
although he doesn't formally acknowledge the connection (unlike the
Scotus like Grammatology) is over tone. Most considerations focus
purely on the type-token relationship. Peirce famously invokes his
trichotomy and has a
Just a note, since I don't know when I'll have time to write
something that actually goes through the logical parallels between
Peirce and Derrida, this is the paper I mentioned on the type-token
repetition.
http://www.degruyter.de/journals/semiotica/pdf/143_35.pdf
"Derrida and Peirce on i
On Feb 2, 2006, at 3:37 AM, Konrad Talmont-Kaminski wrote:
Clark,
Glad you liked the paper. Hope you and the others on the list don't
mind if I point out that the paper was co-written by John and
myself, which explains the link not being for John's page.
More importantly, I'd be curious
Yes, I'd be very interested in seeing the discussion on-list as well.
Jeff Hipolito
Original Message:
-
From: Joseph Ransdell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 09:24:18 -0600
To: peirce-l@lyris.ttu.edu
Subject: [peirce-l] Re: Collier on Pragmatics
I hope fu
inski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Peirce Discussion Forum"
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 4:37 AM
Subject: [peirce-l] Re: Collier on Pragmatics
Clark,
Glad you liked the paper. Hope you and the others on the list don't mind
if I point out that the paper was co-written by
Clark,
Glad you liked the paper. Hope you and the others on the list don't mind
if I point out that the paper was co-written by John and myself, which
explains the link not being for John's page.
More importantly, I'd be curious to know why you thought the paper had
anything in common with D
