Re Marx on Money

1994-03-03 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]) id
On March 1, Jim Devine quoted my 26 Feb posting: "(concerning the quote from Marx about M-M') Re whether the analysis fits within the structure of volume I of capital. I would argue that it can, as I detailed beforehand, but that there's no way Marx (or I) argued that it is a source of

Re: Re Marx on Money

1994-03-03 Thread Jim Devine
On Thu, 03 Mar 1994 07:35:06 +1000 Steve Keen said: First of all, the original quote: "As in the case of labour-power, the use-value of money here is its capacity of creating value--a value greater than it contains." Capital Vol 3, p. 392. It is clear from that quote that--in this context--Marx

Re: college tuitions

1994-03-03 Thread FICHTENBAUM
I think that the major factor behind the growth of college tuition is the growth of administrative bureaucracy. This is certainly the case at most state institutions. I am not sure about private institutions. We have increasing numbers of Vice presidents, Associate Vice presidents, Assistant

Re: nike mystery

1994-03-03 Thread Chris Barrett
I concur with Michael Perelman's assessment. Nike's profits, the obscene retail price-to-labor cost ratio, and athletic shoe industry conduct follow directly from high sunk costs attributable to extensive advertising for product differentiation and proliferation (two distinct concepts --

Re: college tuitions 199403031922.LAA06227@si.ucsc.edu

1994-03-03 Thread Michael Lichter
On the college fees tuition question, a couple answers have been offered so far: 1. Inflating administrative budgets 2. Capital improvements to attract corporate investment My experience with the University of California is that the more than doubling in fees we've experienced over the past

Progressive Economics on TV

1994-03-03 Thread Tom . Weisskopf
Barring a last-minute change in programming plans (always a possibility in today's powderkeg world), the PBS McNeil-Lehrer news show tomorrow -- Friday evening, March 4 -- will include a discussion with PEN-L's own David Gordon and his brother Robert on the state and medium-term trajectory of the

Re Marx on Money

1994-03-03 Thread S8800034
On March 1, Jim Devine quoted my 26 Feb posting: "(concerning the quote from Marx about M-M') Re whether the analysis fits within the structure of volume I of capital. I would argue that it can, as I detailed beforehand, but that there's no way Marx (or I) argued that it is a source of

Re: space (i.e., where we actual stand

1994-03-03 Thread Marshall Feldman
Posted on 3 Mar 1994 at 02:21:43 by Uriacc Mailer (002033) space (i.e., where we actual stand) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 02 Mar 1994 22:30:28 -0800 (PST) I am not about to jump into Gil and Ajit's debates on GE and Sraffa. Not my cup of tea. But something Jim Devine said, along with the

re: college tuitions

1994-03-03 Thread jlgulick
Someone asked why college tuitions are skyrocketing much greater than the rate of inflation. My understanding is that it has something to do with boards of trustees, etc., undertaking massive capital improvement drives (i.e. building high-tech bioengineering and other hard science labs) in order

Re: Re Marx on Money

1994-03-03 Thread Jim Devine
On Thu, 03 Mar 1994 07:35:06 +1000 Steve Keen said: First of all, the original quote: "As in the case of labour-power, the use-value of money here is its capacity of creating value--a value greater than it contains." Capital Vol 3, p. 392. It is clear from that quote that--in this context--Marx

My further response to Gil

1994-03-03 Thread Ajit Sinha
Soon after arriving at Cambridge in 1928, Sraffa explained the basic idea of PCMC to Keynes; to which Keynes is reported to have made this remark to his wife Lydia: "On Saturday I had a long talk with Sraffa about his work. It is a very interesting and ORIGINAL--but I wonder whether his class

re: college tuitions

1994-03-03 Thread Jim Devine
a query relevant to John Gulick's last message: how much does a year in prison cost, relative to a year at the University of California? in pen solidarity, Jim Devine BITNET: jndf@lmuacadINTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Econ. Dept., Loyola Marymount Univ., Los Angeles, CA 90045-2699 USA

FCC and Electronic Mail

1994-03-03 Thread James Love
This may be of interest to other penners. --Alan G. Isaac Original message Distributed to TAP-INFO, a free Internet Distribution List (subscription requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) TAXPAYER ASSETS PROJECT - INFORMATION POLICY NOTE (please

Progressive Economics on TV

1994-03-03 Thread Tom . Weisskopf
Barring a last-minute change in programming plans (always a possibility in today's powderkeg world), the PBS McNeil-Lehrer news show tomorrow -- Friday evening, March 4 -- will include a discussion with PEN-L's own David Gordon and his brother Robert on the state and medium-term trajectory of the

Re: GE/Sraffa: My response to Gil

1994-03-03 Thread S8800034
Steve Keen, i guess inadvertently, sent this posting to me. I'm forwarding it to the net since it appears to be intended for it. Ajit Sinha Original message A brief (supportive) comment on Ajit's posting re Sraffa. Since his purpose was

skills and the WPA

1994-03-03 Thread Richard Jensen
There were some interesting comments by Michael R. Morgenstern on H-URBAN on New Deal relief: "Hopkins sought to preserve the skills of the unemployed through work relief, a major rationale for the WPA, for future employment. As such, the remark

Re: college tuitions

1994-03-03 Thread Michael Lichter
On the college fees tuition question, a couple answers have been offered so far: 1. Inflating administrative budgets 2. Capital improvements to attract corporate investment My experience with the University of California is that the more than doubling in fees we've experienced over the past

Cheap labour and dear shoes

1994-03-03 Thread Paul Cockshott
In reply to Tom, surely this is exactly what one would expect from a Ricardian or Marxian analysis. The price of a commodity depends upon the amount of labour required for its production not upon the level of wages. If wages fall then profits rise but the commodity gets no cheaper. Only a