To everybody:
Who knows the e-mail or something like that of the
Agroecology Program Director in the University of California, Santa Cruz
Thank's in advance
MA. DE LOURDES MENDICUTI NAVARRO
LTV defense: interim responses
==
1. There are still a few more instalments of my "LTV defense" to
come, before the whole structure -- or at least a sketch of it -- is "on
the table" for criticism. Nonetheless, it would be churlish to plough
(plow) ahead without
Marty Hart-Landsberg observes and asks:
So, at the risk of oversimplyfing, one approach calls for building
opposition to the mobility of capitalism on the basis of the nation
state and projects a vision of greater national regulation of
capitalist activity through a restructured and more
Below, "" marks my original comment and "" marks Gil Skillman's
reply. My counterpunch lacks any preliminary punctuation.
On Fri, 18 Mar 1994 14:29:47 -0500 (EST) Gil said:
I'm a little mystified by a contradiction that seems to appear in
Gil Skillman's contributions to pen-l. On the one
Yes, Jim Devine is quite right that Marty's dichotomy is much the same
as between my PNP ("progressive nationalist position") and PIP ("progressive
internationalist position") of last year. Acronymically, Tom Weisskopf
Roemer and exploitation (first part of two on this topic)
===
[Note: LTV part 8 raised the subject of the 'specialness' of labor.
This has several dimensions, but in this message and the next I focus
on labor's specialness as it relates to *exploitation* -- hence getting
To Allin Cottrell: If these are not dealt with in the main
message, they should be saved for an epilogue response.
1) Normality of price dispersion presented in Farjoun and
Machover is NOT a trivial assumption. Most asset prices (at
least) have both seriously skewed and leptokurtotic
Allin comments that my approach via use-value and the one he has
outlined don't give particularly differrent results. Up to the
level we have thus far discussed it, they don't. But if you follow
them further down the track, they do (you've yet to get there in your
postings). What I wished to
To Peter Dorman: The effect of having Korea and Taiwan pegged
to the $ was offset by having most of Latin America also pegged
to the $.
I agree with Tom Weisskopf's last posting (was going to make
same point myself) about role of interest rates. Clearly that
depends on MS constant and we
I appreciate the responses to my posting on economic strategies and the
state. I also hope that, whatever discussion we have, we can build upon
rather than recreate our past discussion/debate of national versus
international perspectives on strategy.
More specifically, I think there is a need
To everybody:
Who knows the e-mail or something like that of the
Agroecology Program Director in the University of California, Santa Cruz
Thank's in advance
MA. DE LOURDES MENDICUTI NAVARRO
This is a short comment on the national vs. international, local vs. global,
etc. debate. This strategy debate is as old as the first time two humaniods
took a stick and drew a line in the sand. We have continued to draw the lines
and fight over them. However, there is a new player on the horizon
LTV defense: interim responses
==
1. There are still a few more instalments of my "LTV defense" to
come, before the whole structure -- or at least a sketch of it -- is "on
the table" for criticism. Nonetheless, it would be churlish to plough
(plow) ahead without
Marty Hart-Landsberg observes and asks:
So, at the risk of oversimplyfing, one approach calls for building
opposition to the mobility of capitalism on the basis of the nation
state and projects a vision of greater national regulation of
capitalist activity through a restructured and more
Below, "" marks my original comment and "" marks Gil Skillman's
reply. My counterpunch lacks any preliminary punctuation.
On Fri, 18 Mar 1994 14:29:47 -0500 (EST) Gil said:
I'm a little mystified by a contradiction that seems to appear in
Gil Skillman's contributions to pen-l. On the one
Yes, Jim Devine is quite right that Marty's dichotomy is much the same
as between my PNP ("progressive nationalist position") and PIP ("progressive
internationalist position") of last year. Acronymically, Tom Weisskopf
Roemer and exploitation (first part of two on this topic)
===
[Note: LTV part 8 raised the subject of the 'specialness' of labor.
This has several dimensions, but in this message and the next I focus
on labor's specialness as it relates to *exploitation* -- hence getting
To Allin Cottrell: If these are not dealt with in the main
message, they should be saved for an epilogue response.
1) Normality of price dispersion presented in Farjoun and
Machover is NOT a trivial assumption. Most asset prices (at
least) have both seriously skewed and leptokurtotic
To Peter Dorman: The effect of having Korea and Taiwan pegged
to the $ was offset by having most of Latin America also pegged
to the $.
I agree with Tom Weisskopf's last posting (was going to make
same point myself) about role of interest rates. Clearly that
depends on MS constant and we
I appreciate the responses to my posting on economic strategies and the
state. I also hope that, whatever discussion we have, we can build upon
rather than recreate our past discussion/debate of national versus
international perspectives on strategy.
More specifically, I think there is a need
21 March 1994
Friends: I am posting an announcement of a new
progressive book series to be published by Lynne Rienner
Publishers and edited by me. I am posting this
announcement to the Pen-L, IPE and Caribbean Economy
lists. Please feel free to inform interested colleagues of the
new series
Apologies for bothering the list with this, but somebody posted a couple of
S L references at the end of last week, which I seem to have inadvertently
deleted. Is there any chance that they could please send them to me again?
Thanks in advance.
Rich Parkin,
Case Western
On 19th March Paul Cockshott wrote:
I have tended to argue against the proposal for a
basic income on several grounds:
1) the advocates of a basic income seem to take as given the
existing capitalistic organisation of our society in which a
large part of the population are unable to find
23 matches
Mail list logo
