Soon after Allin C put forth his LTV Defence 2, I posted a short comment/critic
ism of THE LAWS OF CHAOS by Farjoun and Machover, since his arguments are so
heavely influenced by this book. Apparently it got lost in the vast cyberspace.
I thought may be for good--I will get some work done. But the
Soon after Allin C put forth his LTV Defence 2, I posted a short comment/critic
ism of THE LAWS OF CHAOS by Farjoun and Machover, since his arguments are so
heavely influenced by this book. Apparently it got lost in the vast cyberspace.
I thought may be for good--I will get some work done. But the
Well, here we go again on AS-AD: The Theory that Would Not Die.
I won't reply to Barkley's comments on foreign substitution
except to say that I am not impressed by references to textbooks,
since I have seen them say dubious things in the past. This is
not to say I assume them to be wrong, just
Well, here we go again on AS-AD: The Theory that Would Not Die.
I won't reply to Barkley's comments on foreign substitution
except to say that I am not impressed by references to textbooks,
since I have seen them say dubious things in the past. This is
not to say I assume them to be wrong, just
Y Varga has an interesting discussion of Economic laws
in his book _Politio-Economic Problems of Capitalism_.
I don't agree with everything he writes but I do accept
he view of laws as tendencies.
He writes: "Social laws are therefore no more than tendencies
the development of which is constantl
Y Varga has an interesting discussion of Economic laws
in his book _Politio-Economic Problems of Capitalism_.
I don't agree with everything he writes but I do accept
he view of laws as tendencies.
He writes: "Social laws are therefore no more than tendencies
the development of which is constantl
Michael Perelman seems to be right in his assertion that German
is a pretentious language (unlike English, of course! :-) )
But in my understanding Marx and Engels both used the *weaker
one* of two German words that are both translated as "science."
That word is "Wissenschaft" which I understa
Michael Perelman seems to be right in his assertion that German
is a pretentious language (unlike English, of course! :-) )
But in my understanding Marx and Engels both used the *weaker
one* of two German words that are both translated as "science."
That word is "Wissenschaft" which I understa
I must appologise to people if some of my postings repeat
points that Allin and others may have raised. Mail often
takes a while to get to me, so that I find after I have
sent things out that the debate may already have covered them.
---
I must appologise to people if some of my postings repeat
points that Allin and others may have raised. Mail often
takes a while to get to me, so that I find after I have
sent things out that the debate may already have covered them.
---
It seems to me that Barkley is demanding too much of a theory of value.
Remember what values are in formal terms. They are a set of coercion
operators that map usevalue types onto a single scalar type.
Thus the value of corn is a function of form (corn -> value),
that of horses a function of fo
It seems to me that Barkley is demanding too much of a theory of value.
Remember what values are in formal terms. They are a set of coercion
operators that map usevalue types onto a single scalar type.
Thus the value of corn is a function of form (corn -> value),
that of horses a function of fo
12 matches
Mail list logo
