[PEN-L:3769] Re: *Who are Corporate Criminals?

1995-01-15 Thread Justin Schwartz
See also Russell Mokhiber's Corporate Crime and Violence, Sierra Club Books, 1988. I second Doug's remark that we should nor forget that the most systenatic crime and violence are entirely legal. On Violence Bert Brecht The headlong stream is termed violent But the river bed hemming it in is T

[PEN-L:3768] *Who are Corporate Criminals?

1995-01-15 Thread Chuck Koeber
Nathan Newman wrote on January 15, 1994: > Who are the real corporate criminals? Consider the recent case of GM in which U.S. Transportation Secretary Federico Pena concluded that certain Chevy and GMC pickup trucks are prone to catch fire in side collisions. Rather than force a recall, Pena for

[PEN-L:3767] Re: Who are Corporate Criminals?

1995-01-15 Thread JDCASE
Does "criminal big businessmen"feel better for you, Doug? Or are we just wasting our time until "someone" in a Congress of millionaires declares wage slavery a capital offense? I suppose if Bernie Sanders had added this ammendment to the crime bill even Cockburn might have been interested. J

[PEN-L:3766] Re: New Party piece

1995-01-15 Thread JDCASE
Dear Doug: Did I miss it since 1/5/95, or did your proof that claims of the New Party in Milwaukee were "bullshit"appear elsewhere? I would appreciate reading your remarks. How can I find them? While I find the articles of Nation writers generally interesting and certainly entertaining--

[PEN-L:3765] Urgent Action Alert (fwd)

1995-01-15 Thread D Shniad
Forwarded message: Date: Sun, 15 Jan 1995 13:00:10 -0800 From: La Mujer Obrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Urgent Action Alert [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],

[PEN-L:3764] Re: Who are Corporate Criminals?

1995-01-15 Thread Doug Henwood
Nathan Newman asks for info on corporate criminals and corporate welfare parasites. I'm all for this exercise as long as we don't forget the Old Man's observation - that wage labor, even when entirely legal and apparently voluntary - is based on exploitation. Or as they say around DC, the real cr

[PEN-L:3763] Re: New Party piece

1995-01-15 Thread Doug Henwood
At 7:59 AM 1/15/95, Matt Zeidenberg wrote: >NEW PARTY TIME > >BY DANIEL CANTOR ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) It would be real nice if someone besides me and members of the New Party wrote articles about the New Party. Erwin Knoll asked me several times to expand the pieces I did in LBO on the NP for the

[PEN-L:3762] Re: Who are Corporate Criminals?

1995-01-15 Thread S. Lerner
Have a look at Paul Hawken's book The Ecology of Commerce for some excellent examples. Sally Lerner >Hi, > >The subject header is a serious question. I am working on creating some >propaganda for street organizing (and net organizing) that addresses >right-wing scapegoating versus the true abus

[PEN-L:3761] Re: Unemployment as measure of gains over bysiness cycle

1995-01-15 Thread Ellen Dannin ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sometimes the mass media does a nice job of encapsulating the problems we have now. Even those who are not Start TRek - Deep Space Nine fans might want to look at the last 2-part series in which - as a consequence of the US govt's removing all public supports except 3 basic meals a day - the

[PEN-L:3760] Re: piece from the Progressive

1995-01-15 Thread Ellen Dannin ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Coincidentally, the Labor Party Advocates held a public hearing in the San Francisco area yesterday on the need for a labor party. Four hundred people showed up to participate at the meeting in Hayward. More public hearings are planned across the US. I was not at the meeting but can get a r

[PEN-L:3759] RE: China to Establish Direct Commercial Links to Internet

1995-01-15 Thread FACRICEL
What will this do to the use of internet? Will this very large increase in the number of users overwelm the hardware currently in existence? Recently I spoke with a rep. from Digital who predicted that the use of the internet on a large scale basis as it is now moving towards will destroy the

[PEN-L:3758] Unemployment as measure of gains over bysiness cycle

1995-01-15 Thread Mary Engelmeyer
In this whole discussion about folks rising with the tides and particularly about minorities gaining more during upturns, I wonder how much unemployment stats tell us. What kind of jobs are these people getting? It might well be better to be employed at minimum wage than unemployed. Yet,

[PEN-L:3757] China to Establish Direct Commercial Links to Internet

1995-01-15 Thread Robert Naiman
2. China to Establish Direct Commercial Links to Internet ... 56 Source: The Boston Globe, 1/2/95 Written by: Ted Plaflser Abridged

[PEN-L:3756] Who are Corporate Criminals?

1995-01-15 Thread Nathan Newman
Hi, The subject header is a serious question. I am working on creating some propaganda for street organizing (and net organizing) that addresses right-wing scapegoating versus the true abuses in favor of the wealthy. THe form of the sheet will probably start with: WHO IS THE CORPORATE ELIT

[PEN-L:3755] Re: Krugman and Mundell

1995-01-15 Thread Michael Perelman
Everybody has their own preference for what they want Pen-l to be. I vacillate between wanting to learn how we can use our training to be activists (going beyond the mere repitition of left rhetoric) and gaining deeper insight into economics. Lynn's long postings represent the best of the sec

[PEN-L:3754] Re: piece from the Progressive

1995-01-15 Thread GSKILLMAN
Many thanks to Matt Z. for posting the Progressive piece on the New Party by Daniel Cantor. My main concern with going the third-party route (as opposed to revitalizing the progressive "wing" of the Democratic party) was the divide-and-conquer problem the article spoke to quite effectively.

[PEN-L:3753] piece from the Progressive

1995-01-15 Thread Matt Zeidenberg
NEW PARTY TIME BY DANIEL CANTOR ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Over the last three years, I've had thousands of conversations with people about the idea of building a new political party in the United States. Many of these conversations have been with the leadership of existing organizations: labor un

[PEN-L:3752] Re: economists and failure

1995-01-15 Thread GSKILLMAN
Anders writes: > Doug said that mainstream economists would explain the failure of IBM, > etc. by saying that in the new international economy, they didn't make it > because they'd gotten "fat and lazy." I guess what I'm trying to ask is, > how do smart neoclassicals explain how + when large

[PEN-L:3751] Re: economists and failure

1995-01-15 Thread GSKILLMAN
Doug points out, fairly enough, that Marx the dialectician dealt both with abstractions and the nitty-gritty details of capitalism. But so, for what it's worth, does mainstream economics in its "applied" fields such as Industrial Organization, which Evan somehow thinks are marginalized. Thus t