Dear Pen-lers,
To help a government engaged in negotiations with the IMF, we need to
obtain very quickly the best critical information and references on
privatization, information that would be useful in countering IMF
arguments in this regard. Please help if you can. Send your messages
to [EMA
On Fri, 8 Sep 1995, James Devine wrote:
> I don't know how substantial this issue is, but as far as I can
> tell, there are 5 different meanings of "dialectics":
It was very important for someone here to at least try to put
such complex, mind-bending confusion into some kind of order,
Jim corresponds:
> I wrote:>If I accurately understood what Gil said in response to
> Trond, he is saying that dialectical models may be great but
> that does not mean that we need dialectical reasoning. To me,
> this doesn't make sense; it is crude formalism (a glorification
> of math, form
(this replies to a note titled something like "the effects of
gamma rays on closet stalinists and man in the moon marigolds")
I wrote:>If I accurately understood what Gil said in response to
Trond, he is saying that dialectical models may be great but
that does not mean that we need dialectic
DEMOCRACY BACKGROUNDER: A Forum for the Study of U.S. Government
Democratization Programs and Other Democratization Issues.
*
The DEMOCRACY BACKGROUNDER is a bi-monthly publication produced by
the Interhemispheric Resource Center, a
Good news for geeks! The GAO Daybook is now online!! Details follow!!!
Doug
--
Doug Henwood
[[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Left Business Observer
250 W 85 St
New York NY 10024-3217
USA
+1-212-874-4020 voice
+1-212-874-3137 fax
=
>1.1 - GAO's DAYBOOK VIA LISTSERV
>
>The U.
Jim writes:
> If I accurately understood what Gil said in response to Trond, he
> is saying that dialectical models may be great but that does not
> mean that we need dialectical reasoning. To me, this doesn't make
> sense; it is crude formalism (a glorification of math, formal
> logic, and g
Dear Eric please tell me where you are at the moment?
Regards, Robert McIntyre
Two internet sites of possible interest:
1) Information on 20+ heterodox economics journals.
Initial (& crudely presented) information about
20+ journals that are indexed in the Review of
Heterodox Economics. It appears at
csf.colorado.edu. Go to Economics direc
James Devine wrote:
> The neoclassicals, for example, start with an implicit
> ontological assumption that the world is inherently static, that
> the different spheres of human experience and action are easily
> separable, etc. This vision produces a form of reasoning that is
> inherently st
Ajit writes: >>Congratulation to Barkley for introducing a
substantial issue for debate and steering us away from the mud
throwing contest on individual personalities. It is always
problematic to really know what is meant by *dialectics* in
Marxist literature.<<
I don't know how substantial t
Does anyone know the status of the URPE panels at the ASSA
for January, 1996?
Thanks,
Ann Davis
> -- Forwarded message --
> Date: Wed, 6 Sep 1995 21:44:46 -0400
> From: Andrew Wheat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Multiple Recipients of List Mexico2000 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: U.S.-Tepoztlan links
>
> Please cross-post
>
> Call write or fax Jack Nicklaus and GTE's Don Hayes
To Trond A.
Not to drag this out too much, but I think Ajit Sinha's
remarks are useful in clarifying that Engels' version of
dialectics was not Hegel's and was viewed rightly by many as
a travesty. It was this version that filtered through Plekhanov
to be misused later. Again, very signifi
Reply to Jim D., who says in a comment on my message:
> Recent work by Levins and Lewontin (THE DIALECTICAL BIOLOGIST)
> and others suggest that the Hegel/Engels perspective that
> dialectical reasoning can help us understand nature has a lot of
> truth in it.
Possibly, but if you by "nature
Reply to Gil Skillman, who says
>
> Trond writes
>
> > I find the following elements of dialectics in conjunction with
> > materialism very appropriate:
> >
> > - Description of social relationships and phenomena as transitory
> > and changing as opposed to static.
> >
> > - These
Reply to Barkley, who says:
> I did not throw out dialectics. I fully agree with
> your analysis of it, including especially its use/interpretation
> in modern nonlinear dynamics.
I suspected that, Barkley. :-)
But all the same -
> The issue is the extension of
> dialectics d
17 matches
Mail list logo
