Not that I imagine Sid would stop posting just because this LAMA person
says to, but just for the record, I really appreciate Sid's postings on
various economic data, reports of "downsizings," human rights violations,
etc. Some I skip, some I skim, some I read carefully, some I save to hard
drive,
Sid Shnad writes:
>It has become a contemporary article of faith that the jobs
of the future will be in the high tech sector. Of late,
however, there has been a great deal of evidence that
presents a prima facie challenge to this article of faith.
Around December 1994, I think, the Wall St. Jou
A friend asks me when is the Socialist Scholars' Conference this year?
Thanks.
Blair
At 9:03 AM 1/19/96, Peter.Dorman wrote:
>A quick reply to Blair, who says that environmentalism encourages people to
>create more markets rather than search for alternatives to capitalism.
>
>I agree that most *economists* who become exercised over environmental issues
>look for market-like soluti
At 5:36 AM 1/19/96, Mike Meeropol wrote:
>I know this uses the neoclassical approach but one way I have tried to bring
>home to me students the importance of what Terry has stated in this
>paragraph is to ask them to consider the VALUE of the enironment in which we
>humans must live to be INFINIT
At 5:06 AM 1/19/96, Terrence Mc Donough wrote:
>Blairs last post was an accomplished and eloquent rant if rant it
>was. It raises three substantive issues: is the human economy
>properly understood as a subsystem of the natural ecology; does the
>human economy "compete" with the natural ecology
Paul Phillips comments on trade unions (PEN-L 2412) are some of the more
sensible comments on trade unions I have read so far in my 4 months on this
list. I don't agree with all that he has said, but he displays a greater
understanding of the fundamental dynamic that unions must operate in.
My e
Treacy: Now that NCR, headquartered here in Dayton got its old name and
independence back this week from AT&T GLOBAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS,
I pass on Jerry Pournolle's remark that if AT&T took over
Kentucky Fried Chicken they would have used as an advertising
sloga
For what it's worth, I wrote a paper many years ago demonstrating that the
contestable market hypothesis is simply a multiproduct version of limit
pricing. Baumol, Panzer, and Willig do some fancy footwork in their book to
disguise this, but with a little attention to the formalization it becomes
J. Kervin wrote:
> (If you can't play the game, get off the field! Unsubscribe!)
a) I agree with the rest of your post.
b) Better yet, let's not play games.
c) It's not a game.
Jerry
Sid,
I expect that the laid off workers from telecom and computers will be replaced
by either new employees on a different basis (less pay, benefits, and
influence over the company) or through contracting out -- with similar
consequences. Yes, there will be some speed-up and technological replace
A couple of points...
1. "Get a life"? The postings referred to DO involve lives, and the
livelihoods, of many individuals in post-industrial societies. If the
bottom line is what makes a healthy society, this information is
certainly germane.
2. "Crap"? Are the facts wrong? Are they mis
Where can you participate in discussions via forums, email, and live
chat with fellow progressives?
Answer: LBBS
Where can you interact with writers, columnists, and editors of
progressive journals as well as with their readers?
Answer: LBBS
Where can you take online courses taught by leading
At 9:56 AM 1/20/96, D Shniad wrote:
>Doug,
>
>I think you're wrong about Marty the Brilliant Incisive One, he who is so
>courageous that he refuses to identify himself or sign his full name.
>
>It strikes me that folks who appreciate his wonderful postings should
>thank him personally at his addr
> Subject: OPPOSE MILITARIZATION OF DRUG WAR
>
> Colisteros,
>
> In light of the growing suspicion--or should I say certainty--that under the
> guise of the war on drugs the US is funnelling military aid to Mexico, which
> is being used against the people of Chiapas, Oaxaca, Guerrero and other
>
Doug,
I think you're wrong about Marty the Brilliant Incisive One, he who is so
courageous that he refuses to identify himself or sign his full name.
It strikes me that folks who appreciate his wonderful postings should
thank him personally at his address listed below:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Si
At 7:15 PM 1/19/96, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Sid -
>Get a life. Stop posting this crap.
Here we go again. Lay off Sid; I like what he posts.
I swear I won't say anything about America Online.
Doug
--
Doug Henwood
Left Business Observer
250 W 85 St
New York NY 10024-3217
USA
+1-212-874-4020
Lisa Rogers wrote:
>
> >>> Mike Meeropol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1/19/96, 06:36am
> Just ONE THOUGHT on Terry's post responding to Blair:
> [snip]
> I know this uses the neoclassical approach but one way I have tried
> to bring home to me students the importance of what Terry has stated
> in this p
You get a life, Marty. Some of us are glad to learn about these things,
as distressing as they may be. Who do you think you are to pontificate
in this way?
Jon Peirce
Memorial U. of Nfld.
19 matches
Mail list logo