At 07:18 AM 10/29/96 -0800, Doug Henwood wrote:
>Well, I'm reading - intermittently - Teresa Ebert's book Ludic Feminism and
>After (excellent in content, but she writes in that awful English
>department way), and she goes into these issues in great depth, from a
>Marxist-feminist viewpoint. I'll
ON UNION-BUSTING ACCUSATIONS AT AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL:
EDITORIAL NOTE: Below is a message from the Amnesty International Board
Chair responding to a note I forwarded about accusations of
union busting at AI offices. I have no personal knowledge of exactly what
happened in the union campaign,
The Theater of the Oppressed Laboratory
122 West 27 Street, 10 floor
New York, New York 10001
(212) 924-1858
(212) 741-4563 (fax)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (e-mail)
The Theater of the Oppressed Laboratory presents
Interactive Workshops for Social Change
Friday, November 8, 6-9 pm and
Saturday, November
The Brecht Forum
and its projects,
The New York Marxist School
and
The Institute for Popular Education
122 West 27 Street, 10 floor
New York, New York 10001
(212) 242-4201
(212) 741-4563 (fax)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (e-mail)
The Brecht Forum presents a special symposium
Culture Matters
Friday, No
simply forwarding this on the grounds of right of response. i am not
endorsing the view presented here. -rn
---
DATE:Sunday, October 27, 1996
FROM:Mort Winston
Chair, AIUSA Board of Directors
TO: Mr. Nathaniel A. Stone
message of October 25, 1995
RE: AIUS
The Brecht Forum
and its projects,
The New York Marxist School
and
The Institute for Popular Education
122 West 27 Street, 10 floor
New York, New York 10001
(212) 242-4201
(212) 741-4563 (fax)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (e-mail)
November 1996 Events
**ELECTION NIGHT FOLLIES***
Ellen Dannin wrote:
> Actually, I think the opposite is the case. The organization needs to
> admit it IS an employer vis a vis these employees and to decide that it
> wants to be a progressive model of an employer. Instead, what I have
> observed happens most often is that the organization dec
The problem with all indexes measuring market concentration, including
Herfindahl, is deciding what makes up a company in an industry. Since the
merger and diversification craze of the 1980s, most corporations own pieces
of very diverse markets. The other problems with all concentration indexes
I work in a unionized setting, so, it is not necessary for me to adopt the
goals of the company I work for. However, it seems that non-union workers,
especially those on the fast track up, do need to adopt company goals. I
still think, though, that non-profits require a dedication which is not
r
After much languishing in darkness and neglect, the LBO website
(http://www.panix.com/~dhenwood/LBO_home) has now been much upgraded. A bit
snazzier, easier navigation, and more content.
New article highlights:
* Globalization/antiglobalization - with a special look at the
International Forum on
On Tue, 29 Oct 1996, Terrence Mc Donough wrote:
> Collective bargaining type models don't work well in progressive
> org's because the org shouldn't be using its powerful position as an
> employer in the bargaining process. Similarly, the social
> consciousness and personalized relationships
Why does a choice have to be made between private capitalist--or
even private cooperative--ownership on the one hand and state
ownership on the other? This is
to presuppose that property is one thing and must be vested
whole and entire in one kind of social actor or another. But
*social* o
I have followed the debate about exploitation in progressive organisations
with interest. I think perhaps this also has a parallel with economics -
that is, "labour" in government (certainly in recent times) have pursued
economically rationalist policies, when in opposition they try to define
th
Jerry (no known relation to Dominique) Levy asks:
>>Jim: You wouldn't call the period since 1952 [44 years] the
"long run"? Given what Dumenil & Levy ... write ..., isn't
Alejandro's quote accurate?<<
I don't know what exactly Alejandro was saying (and I do not want
to argue with him), but sin
Jim Devine writes:
But decentralized
democracy (worker co-ops, community co-ops, etc.) have been
central to alternatives to social-democratic and Marxist-Leninist
statism.
Comment: Social democratic governments surely are strongly in favor
of co-ops. Indeed, provinces such as Manitoba and Sa
Jim: You wouldn't call the period since 1952 [44 years] the "long run"?
Given what Dumenil & Levy [no relation, I think, JL] write below, isn't
Alejandro's quote accurate?
Jerry
On Tue, 29 Oct 1996 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Alejandro Valle Baeza writes that: >>I think that Dumenil et al
> showe
Alejandro Valle Baeza writes that: >>I think that Dumenil et al
showed that rate of profit is falling in the long run in the US
economy.<<
The last book that Alejandro cites Dumenil & Levy, The Economics
of Profit Rate, does not show a downward trend from 1869 to the
present. Rather, the data
> On Mon, 28 Oct 1996, Steele, Jen wrote:
>
> >
> > I've been looking for a PhD program with an interdisiplinary approach,
> > combining (radical/intl/comparative) political economy, gender and labor
> > studies.The New School's economics program looks great, but I've heard they
> > can't off
If you don't mind first completing a very standard core of macro/micro
etc., I would recommend looking into UC Riverside. Howard Sherman, Gary
Dymski, Steve Cullenberg, Bob Pollin, Victor Lippit, Ronald
Chilcote (and others) are just some of the people you can work with in
political economy. Kei
Please let potentially interested candidates know about this opportunity.
We are a small department that emphasizes excellent teaching. We prize
quality of, and commitment to, teaching and scholarly activity over
adherence to any particular orthodoxy. For more information, please
contact me priv
Tom Walker wrote:
> Roediger and Foner argue "The length of the workdays... has historically
> been the central issue raised by the American labor movement during its most
> dynamic periods of organization".
That may be true, but there is some controversy among labor historians
regarding how mov
>Does anyone know of any alternative/unconventional (but reasonable)
>measures of market concentration other than the Herfindahl Index?
some suggestions:
consider i= industry s= PMSA SUMs = summation over PMSA s
CONi=concentration of industry i EMPis Employment of industry i at PMSA s
Labor Notes also has a new pamphlet out on this. I think it's called
_Our Time_. I leafed through it and it looked pretty good. Their
address is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cheers,
Tavis
On Tue, 29 Oct 1996, Tom Walker wrote:
> By all means explore my web site more, I'd also recommend the follow
Does anyone know of any alternative/unconventional (but reasonable)
measures of market concentration other than the Herfindahl Index?
Also: how does one access the Pen-l archive?
Thanks,
Jason Hecht
>I guess I should explore your web site more because I'm
>not clear on what the politics of free time is about.
>If it's 'thirty for forty,' then a raft of economic
>doubts, or issues, at least, come into play. Work
>sharing is a different, more plausible matter, though
>I'm not persuaded that it
Collective bargaining type models don't work well in progressive
org's because the org shouldn't be using its powerful position as an
employer in the bargaining process. Similarly, the social
consciousness and personalized relationships of the org can be abused
by employees. In one I was inv
This is in reply to, I apologize that I deleted the
message and missed the name, the person who noted Krugman's
dismissing the 1950s and 1960s regional economics
literature.
It is not just that. He recognizes that lit, but
disses it because of its lack of neoclassical formalism.
Wh
Regarding a couple of topics from unamerican activities day:
Bill M(ate) might be interested in knowing that Ireland currently has
a system of tripartite wage bargaining between employers federations,
the trade union congress and the government. Interestingly, this
explicitly includes levels o
On Mon, 28 Oct 1996, Steele, Jen wrote:
>
> I've been looking for a PhD program with an interdisiplinary approach,
> combining (radical/intl/comparative) political economy, gender and labor
> studies.The New School's economics program looks great, but I've heard they
> can't offer much financ
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I'm not sure I understand the transposition of my comments from private
> progressive organizations to a public sphere. I think the characteristics of
> the two sectors are quite different. The public sphere is highly unionized,
> and monitored by a phalanx of civil
> If he is indeed the emperor of the new economic geography, then he is an
> emperor who has no clothes.
I completely agree. Krugman (like Michael Porter and other business school
guys) think that they are genius and they pretend as if they discover
everything new. Moreover, they undermine all s
Doug Henwood wrote:
> Value is a
> concept, a way of thinking about a social relation. What I object to is the
> attempt to put numbers on it, to do Marxian econometrics with it.
How can value *only* have a qualitative dimension? By ignoring the
quantitative dimension and the value-form, value i
At 7:38 AM 10/29/96, Gerald Levy wrote:
>But, Doug: I thought you rejected value theory. Is that a sign that you
>have something in common with Baudrillard?
One more time, slowly, so even you can understand, Jerry. Value is a
concept, a way of thinking about a social relation. What I object to i
Doug Henwood wrote:
> For some reason, I've just been reading Baudrillard's absurd book, The
> Transparency of Evil. To B., the political economy of the "sign" has
> replaced the p.e. of value.
But, Doug: I thought you rejected value theory. Is that a sign that you
have something in common with
At 6:56 PM 10/28/96, Ajit Sinha wrote:
>At 09:10 AM 10/28/96 -0800, you (Doug Henwood) wrote:
> (as if, among other
>>things, there weren't critiques of decon from the left for being the
>>essentially conservative thing it is).
>__
>And why is that? Could you elaborate a b
As long as the debate is about labor unions, an interesting "problem"
that arose this past year in Oregon related to the Oregon Public
Employees Union's (OPEU) pension fund. Probably like many "union employee"
pension funds, OPEU had lent KKR millions of dollars to finance its
merger and aq
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [PEN-L:6987] Fwd: Re: exploitation in progressive organizations? (was
>re:aiusa)
> 2. (...) to have the same goals as the organization,
> something profit making businesses do not expect. As a plain old worker in a
> company, you are expected
37 matches
Mail list logo
