I trust this is not too old a thread to allow further comment.
I know that PEN-ers may be allergic to the name, but still - I was
surprised that the old Leninist adage of Support them (=social
democracy) like a rope supports a hanged man - did not come up. Though
the intent of Jim C's return to
Hari:
However, I cannot
believe that some modification of this view does not allow mobilisation
behind a non-SD-ic but liberal candidate - i.e. in the circus of all
electoral circuses, those taking place in the USA [Oh sorry, I forgot
India - they are the best cirucses I have seen].
But that's
Recalled beef was served at Nevada County eateries
By Jon Ortiz -- Bee Staff Writer
Published 2:15 a.m. PST Saturday, January 17, 2004
Get weekday updates of Sacramento Bee headlines and breaking news. Sign up
here.
Three weeks after federal officials issued a recall of beef linked to a mad
cow
I thought that Halliburton had already been exonerated by the Army Corps of
Engineers. THere was a ruling made by Gen Flowers that Halliburton was not
required to provide cost-pricing data for its dealings with a Kuwait
supplier and that a fair price was paid. The ruling was made Dec. 19. See
Wall
Lou asked the key question about the election.
Louis Proyect wrote:
It is obvious that a Dean
presidency will not be as bad as a Bush presidency, but in terms of the
real material conditions of life, the differences will have no effect.
Unemployment, bad health, rotten schools, shabby
It's off with Gramsci and on with Che. . . .l love them both, but as I re-read Jon Anderson's 1997 book on Che and the Cuban revolution. . .and as I read deeper into how Lenin made the Russian revolution. . .and as I reflect on how the IRA, Sandinistas and Vietnamese made their revolutions
Michael Perelman writes:
What would have happened if Gore had been president on September 11? We have
had to prove his manhood and to act more precipitously than Bush?
we should remember that it was a Democrat (Truman) who started the Cold War and the
McCarthyite loyalty checks. The the GOP --
Jose writes:
Jim presents a pretty straightforward lesser evil argument in defense of Michael
Moore's position.
Response (Jim C): This may appear to be equivocating but it isn't. Read what I said
exactly:
This will no doubt piss some people off, but I can understand why self-described
Back around September or so I read about a forthcoming book that would
assert that LBJ was behind the assassination of JFK.
What made it most interesting was that the author was the father of
Bush's press spokesperson. Can't recall if it is the current one or the
previous one.
But I haven't heard
It is the dad of the current spokeman.
On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 02:16:10PM -0800, Eugene Coyle wrote:
Back around September or so I read about a forthcoming book that would
assert that LBJ was behind the assassination of JFK.
What made it most interesting was that the author was the father of
Why is it that financial pundits are saying that fixed income funds are
a bad idea going forward? If the current decade 2000-2010 is similar to
the 1970-1980 decade, which it seems to me it kind of is, why wouldn't a
fixed income fund do well?
Joanna
Why is it that financial pundits are saying that fixed income funds are
a bad idea going forward?
irrational exuberance?
Jim
A CALL TO ACTION FOR SOLIDARITY WITH THE ARAB-AMERICAN AND
MUSLIM COMMUNITY
The following compelling Open Letter from the Arab-American and Muslim
Community to the US Anti-War Movement was issued by 41 organizations
(listed below), and has received widespread support from across the
United
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0117-01.htm
Does this help his progressive credentials?
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929
Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail michael at ecst.csuchico.edu
I did not see the origin of this thread. But I assume the pundits
foresee higher interest rates ahead, in which case the value of the
bonds in the funds will drop. Value goes down as interest rates go up.
Gene
joanna bujes wrote:
Why is it that financial pundits are saying that fixed income
I have been looking over an interesting article
Cowie, Jefferson. 2002. Nixon's Class Struggle: Strategic
Formulations of the New-Right Worker. Labor History (August).
You can read it on line
http://www.findarticles.com/cf_0/m0348/3_43/91201898/p1/article.jhtml?term=
It suggests that Nixon was
Noted German historian Oscar Meyer was rummaging through a dusty box
of archives in the former East Berlin recently. He found a tattered book
entitled Mann, wo ist mein Vaterland? by Michael Mohr lying in the back
of one box of papers, which had been severely singed by the saturation
bombing
Mike Ballard wrote:
We have to take what we can get until we're class
consciously organized and therefore powerful enough to
take it ALL back.
You mean that there will come a wonderful day when, having gone to bed
voting for the DP, we awaken the next morning to a glorious dawn of
class
http://www.texasobserver.org/showArticle.asp?ArticleID=1540
[snip]
Mistakes are a useful conceptual tool for Stiglitz as he sets about
explaining the boom and bust of the 1990s. Because he will not admit the
existence of social classes as any kind of defining force in economics or
politics, it
Hari Kumar wrote:
I trust this is not too old a thread to allow further comment.
I know that PEN-ers may be allergic to the name, but still - I was
surprised that the old Leninist adage of Support them (=social
democracy) like a rope supports a hanged man - did not come up. Though
the intent
CC wrote:
George Bush is NOT a fascist (he may be worse in some ways, but he is
not remotely the leader of a fascist movement)
So Ubu Potus is *worse* than a fascist! And who is it who is supposed
not to care whether or not he consolidates and worsens yet further
his *worse than fascist* regime?
A friend sent me this interview with George Lakoff, which goes towards
answering your question, Michael.
Inside the Frame
http://www.alternet.org/print.html?StoryID=17574
Inside
the Frame
BuzzFlash
January 15, 2004
Viewed
on January 16, 2004
George Lakoff,
Lakoff's framing is very important. We don't know how to do it -- at
least I have not figured out how.
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929
Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail michael at ecst.csuchico.edu
- Original Message -
From: Eugene Coyle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A friend sent me this interview with George Lakoff, which goes towards
answering your question, Michael.
Inside the Frame
http://www.alternet.org/print.html?StoryID=17574
Inside the Frame
BuzzFlash
January 15, 2004
Michael wrote:
Lakoff's framing is very important. We don't know how to do it -- at
least I have not figured out how.
But it's the simplest thing in the world--always has been. Just
establish virtually monopoly control over all the means of
mass communication. Good luck. :-)
25 matches
Mail list logo