Re: Pictures of the San Francisco Antiwar Demo

2003-01-19 Thread ScottH9999
The San Francisco antiwar demonstration was indeed really huge, certainly the biggest demonstration in this area since the Vietnam War days--and even then only a few demos might have been bigger, I think. It seemed to me to be at least twice the size of the Oct. 26 event, which was very big its

Capitalist property rights triumph on Mao painting

2002-12-28 Thread ScottH9999
One of the curious things about discussions among "leftists" is that we can't agree about ANYTHING. Even about what capitalism and socialism are. Is China a capitalist country, for example? Well, most people on the left are finally starting to admit that China has become a capitalist country--th

When they say 'no need to panic', it's time to panic

2002-09-09 Thread ScottH9999
Japan's economic crisis is intensifying again, and the chief of the IMF says "no need to panic". I will merely recite my No-Panic Contrary Rule: When they say there's "no need to panic", that is precisely the time to start to panic. --Scott Harrison IMF Chief Downplays Japan's Woes By HANS

Re: Re: American anti-terrorist drive targets Filipino Communists

2002-08-15 Thread ScottH9999
In a message dated 8/14/02 9:03:59 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I have heard nothing about this particular case. I wonder how common it > is. The main focus of the U.S. "war on terrorism" remains on radical Islam, but it has already shown several signs of being expan

Re: Expertise and Vanguard Parties

2002-07-30 Thread ScottH9999
In a message dated 7/30/02 1:38:53 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > >Well, I'm glad we can agree on one thing--you are indeed a bourgeois > >liberal. > >Why you hang out on pen-l is still a mystery to me, however. I think very > >few > >people here regard themselv

Re: Re: Expertise and Vanguard Parties

2002-07-30 Thread ScottH9999
[I wrote:] > >It is a popular bourgeois myth that there is no place for expertise in > >politics. Actually, there is room for knowledge, wisdom, a scientific > >approach, and expertise everywhere, and certainly in politics. [In a message dated 7/29/02 9:17:28 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL

Re: Re: Re: RE: Expertise

2002-07-29 Thread ScottH9999
In a message dated 7/29/02 1:49:29 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > Of course, in politics, the main body of "experts" > >is the revolutionary party guiding society. > > > > > Gaak. That is exactly where there and can be no expertise, just politics. > When will

Re: RE: Expertise

2002-07-29 Thread ScottH9999
In a message dated 7/29/02 10:55:43 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > We should never forget that just > because "we experts" "know more than they do," their insights can be > extremely useful and even superior. Experts and authorities are needed everywhere, but as Jim D

Re: re: To JD vis-a-vis "stages of imperialism".

2002-07-07 Thread ScottH9999
f base. As it happens, I have two essays posted on the web that criticize this sort of thing, condemning it as a failure to take note of the particularity of contradiction (in dialectical terms). The first of these is a long critique of the Revolutionary Communist Party, USA's scheme of imperi

Re: RE: Re: "dialectical approach"

2002-07-07 Thread ScottH9999
Jim wrote: > However, I think it's a mistake to assert that "Everything in the world (and > also in human society and in human thought) is composed of dialectical > contradictions." In view of the idea that dialectical thinking is more of a > set of questions than a set of pre-digested answe

Re: "dialectical approach"

2002-07-07 Thread ScottH9999
In a message dated 7/5/02 5:30:11 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Nancy writes: >I guess my question is, "What *is* a dialectical approach?< > > In their THE DIALECTICAL BIOLOGIST, Levins & Lewontin have a useful > description of the dialectical approach, though it's ha

Re: Indentured servitude at Wal-Mart

2002-06-26 Thread ScottH9999
Forgive me if my following comment has already been made by others, or if--indeed--it is really unnecessary to make it at all on this list. But the thing that I found most interesting about the article below, which Louis posted, was the outrage of the workers who objected to being forced to "w

Re: Reading List

2002-06-22 Thread ScottH9999
In a message dated 6/22/02 9:10:26 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > A reader of my web site asks for a list of suggested > books on economics for the lay person. I'd like to > post such a list and hereby ask for nominees. I already > post organizations that publish mate

Possible West Coast dock strike could create economic havoc

2002-06-06 Thread ScottH9999
http://www.sfweekly.com/issues/2002-06-05/smith.html/1/index.html >From sfweekly.com Originally published by SF Weekly Jun 05, 2002 ©2002 New Times, Inc. All rights reserved. Off the Waterfront News media have abandoned the labor beat and missed a story of global financial import: the loomi

Re: Re: Boiling water and dialectical leaps

2002-05-22 Thread ScottH9999
munist Party, USA, with respect to both political economy and its general political appraisal of the world situation. It is posted at: http://members.aol.com/ScottH/essays/NotesNPE.htm It is true that water does not begin to boil at an instaneous moment. Boiling itself is a process, and al

Marxism, philosophy and biology

2002-05-21 Thread ScottH9999
In a message dated 5/21/02 12:57:44 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > I find it somewhat ironic that Michael should say that this theory > > > should have in turn influenced him and others in the area of political > > > economy. The qu

Re: Re: gould dies at 60

2002-05-21 Thread ScottH9999
In a message dated 5/21/02 9:04:53 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Stephen Gould's is a great loss. He seems to have been an exceptional > person in many ways. He certainly has enriched my understanding of > economic processes, especially with his theory of the punctuat

Re: Re: self-interest vs class consciousness or pro -israel...

2002-05-15 Thread ScottH9999
Chris-- There are three issues we should not confuse: 1) Who benefits from U.S. government actions? 2) Why does the U.S. do the things it does? 3) Which sections of the U.S. population support the actions of the government? It seems to me the answer to 1) is that the principal beneficiary of a

Re: self-interest rather than pro-israeli support drive US

2002-05-14 Thread ScottH9999
In a message dated 5/14/02 11:41:05 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > ...the primary aim of U.S. policy in the Middle East is U.S. dominance over > the region and its oil resources, through support for regimes that play our > game and through our ever-increasing military

The bitter irony in Holland

2002-05-05 Thread ScottH9999
In a message dated 5/5/02 11:39:03 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > Jurriaan Bendien wrote: > > > > > > The Socialist Party I belong to here was originally Maoist, but they > > ditched that mostly, in order to create a new socialist movement which > > addressed th

Re: Re: Confessions of a Philosopher

2002-05-02 Thread ScottH9999
"It is a fact, that every philosopher of eminence for the two last centuries has either been murdered, or, at the least, been very near it; insomuch, that if a man calls himself a philosopher, and never had his life attempted, rest assured there is nothing in him." --Thomas de Quincey, "On Murd

Re: military fiscalism and trickle down economics

2002-04-30 Thread ScottH9999
In a message dated 4/29/02 7:15:17 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Usually, when people use the phrase "trickle down economics," they rightly > use it with disdain. But in the case of military Keynesianism, we've got to > admit that (at least in the short run), there is a

Re: Positivism wrap up (for me!)

2001-04-30 Thread ScottH9999
In a message dated 4/28/01 11:39:14 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Scott was right, and I was wrong, about the date of Einstein's Brownian > motion paper (1905). Of course this pushes back the date at which it was > still reasonable to be skeptical of the atomic hypoth

Re: Re: Positivism (What is it?)

2001-04-27 Thread ScottH9999
In a message dated 4/27/01 1:27:15 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Scott, > > You are right to reproach me for my caustic and rude tone, and your > responded better than I deserved, for which thanks, and I apologize directly > to you. We disagree on many things, how

Re: Positivism (What is it?)

2001-04-27 Thread ScottH9999
In a message dated 4/27/01 8:39:56 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > Beating on "positivism" is beating a dead horse, if logical empiricsim is > meant--at least in philosophy. However there are serious inaccuracies in the > following that I will comment on. > Just

Re: Re: Positivism (What is it?)

2001-04-27 Thread ScottH9999
In a message dated 4/26/01 8:22:16 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > avi narayan wrote: > > > > Carrol Cox wrote: > > > > > > > > Anyone have a better definition of positivism? > > > > > > > http://www.utm.edu/research/iep/l/logpos.htm > > > > is a good start at

Re: Utility on display

2001-04-26 Thread ScottH9999
In a message dated 4/26/01 7:19:52 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > "In a foyer of University College London, in a glass fronted cabinet, sits > the preserved body of Jeremy Bentham; philosopher, economist, expounder of > Utilitarianism, Bentham is chiefly remembered for i

Re: Re: Re: Utility on display

2001-04-26 Thread ScottH9999
In a message dated 4/26/01 10:46:00 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > Why, you may ask, has the University seen fit to display Bentham all these > > years? The answer, like the answer to so many other questions, is that we > > liv