ACLU Calls Immigrant Registration Program Pretext for Mass Detentions
December 19, 2002
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
WASHINGTON - In a development that confirms the American Civil
Liberties Union's initial fears about a controversial immigrant
fingerprinting and registration program, the Immigr
"ACLU of Illinois Challenges Ethnic and Religious Bias in Strip
Search of Muslim Woman at O'Hare International Airport," 16 Jan. 02,
at <http://www.aclu.org/news/2002/n011602a.html>.
--
Yoshie
* Calendar of Events in Columbus:
<http://www.osu.edu/students/sif/c
>From the website of the American Civil Liberties Union.
To send a prepared letter to President Clinton and/or
your Congressional representatives, check out:
<
http://www.aclu.org/cgi-bin/take_action2000.pl?GetDoc=
341&dir=aclu&redirect=/act>
Impose A Moratorium on Federal Ex
Already, people who espouse unpopular causes cannot advertise. What made the ACLU
case reprehensible was the change in policy right after the infusion of funds from
the industry.
Doug Henwood wrote:
> Michael Perelman wrote:
>
> >Justin, the ACLU is probably 90% correct (my estimat
Michael Perelman wrote:
>Justin, the ACLU is probably 90% correct (my estimate). I don't think that we
>are aiming at it. The stand of the representative in Philadelphia
>is terrible.
>The tobacco case was abominable.
Why? Suppose NORML or some other drug-law reform organiza
I have looked at this link and find the information in it disturbing. I will
write the national ACLU about the matter. If you all are not ACLU
members--and why not?--you should join and write too. You should know that,
as with many affiliate-based groups with a national office, the NO does not
In a message dated 8/5/00 4:28:03 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< No. I am still in possession of the file with all the correspondence,
including the defamatory letter. I stated unequivocally that we will never
know whether the red-baiting had any influence and I tagged
In a message dated 8/5/00 3:59:50 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< We count on _you_ (= Justin Schwartz), but can we count on the ACLU
in general?
>So, it all depends on which faction within the ACLU has power in each
chapter & national organization
Justin, the ACLU is probably 90% correct (my estimate). I don't think that we
are aiming at it. The stand of the representative in Philadelphia is terrible.
The tobacco case was abominable.
http://www.tobacco.org/News/aclu11.96.html
The above link gives some details about the abrupt chan
JKSCHW wrote,
> The story below is pure innuendo. Maybe this person thought that
> red-baiting would work. Maybe he was wrong. You have no idea. I note,
> btw, that under no reading of any free speech right do you have any
> claim on the charitable resources of a private group.
No.
Justin says:
>However, you do know for sure is that if the state passes a law penalizing
>left speech, or the cops start harassing you for your political activity, the
>people to call are the ACLU and the NLG, and they will be there, whether you
>are a Stalinist, an anarchist, a r
. I
haven't yet looked at the site Michael referred me to. I don't think the ACLU
ought to be defending big tobacco's right to advertise, not least because its
resources are very limited, and big tobacco can look out for itself. I do
think that big tobacco ought to be allowed to
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 1996 10:40:03 -0400
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Academics writing about labor law
On behalf of the ACLU Taskforce on Civil Liberties in the Workplace, I am
interested in finding academics who write and/or
> Date: Wed, 7 Feb 1996 23:28:32 -0800
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Audrie Krause)
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: CPSR Joins in ACLU Lawsuit
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> CPSR Joins in Challenging Communications Decency Act
>
> Computer Professionals for Socia
14 matches
Mail list logo
