Title: Marx's materialism
Perhaps a discussion of the relation of Marx's materialism to scientific materialism will be less emotionally provocative than a discussion of the scientific materialist explanation of schizophrenia.
What follows examines the consistency of a particul
ntly for internal relations, self-determination
>and final causation. Marx's materialism does the same thing, in my judgment.
Interesting. This is the first attempt I've seen on or off the Internet to
make an amalgam between Marx and Whitehead outside of David Harvey's
"Justice, Na
Ted Winslow wrote:
>
> To begin with, the idea that ideas can be fully "reduced" in this way
> is mistaken. It is, for instance,
I agree that Ted has chosen extremely important passages from Marx, but
I
don't have the slightest ideas what this post is about because (a) I
don't know
who said t
Louis:
>This is the first attempt I've seen on or off the Internet to
>make an amalgam between Marx and Whitehead
Russell Kleinbach, 1982, _Marx Via Process: Whitehead's Potential
Contribution to Marxian Social Theory_, D.C.: University Press of America.
Also, not Whitehead, but what I consider
My message was narrower in focus than Marx's method and dialectical
materialism, etc., focusing rather on the Whitehead-Marx connection and
related programs. On a more general note, it has been a long time since I
looked at it, but I remember liking:
Sayer, Derek, _Marx's method : ideology, scie
ubject: [PEN-L:17644] Re: Marx's materialism
Ted Winslow wrote:
>
> To begin with, the idea that ideas can be fully "reduced" in this way
> is mistaken. It is, for instance,
I agree that Ted has chosen extremely important passages from Marx, but
I
don't have the slig
I would add that to discuss Marx's materialism, one would have to take into
account the twentieth century contributions to the understanding of 'matter'
and 'energy'
Second, it not an unusual position in twentieth century social science to
admit the dialectic between m
>It's scary- I'm getting old enough to make going back to my dissertation
>bibliography nostalgic. Louis- wasn't this what you were also doing once at
>the Graduate Faculty of the New School??
Naw. Staying out of the war in Vietnam was more like it.
Louis Proyect
Marxism mailing list: http://ww
And I must forceably put forward the work of Lawrence Krader.
The Dialectics of Civil Society
Treatise of Social Labor
as the most significant outline of Marxist materialism in the second half of the
twentieth century.
Rod
Mathew Forstater wrote:
> Louis:
>
> >This is the first attempt I've s
Carrol Cox wrote:
> I consider Ted's ideas on psychology not so much wrong as not
> worth discussing. I wonder if we can find a common ground which will
> enable us to state our disagreements. I could perceive no common ground
> in his post on Freud/Klein etc.
"We murder to dissect."
"when your
At 08:05 PM 04/02/2000 -0400, you wrote:
>I would add that to discuss Marx's materialism, one would have to take into
>account the twentieth century contributions to the understanding of 'matter'
>and 'energy'
>
>Second, it not an unusual position in twenti
directly pointed to in the third thesis on Feuerbach.
The best critical discussions of scientific materialism in relation to 20th
century developments in science that I know are Whitehead's e.g. Science and
the Modern World. He elaborates an alternative ontological foundation for
science that allo
Interesting, because Krader's work on nomadic pastoralists is also
excellent.
-Original Message-
From: Rod Hay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Monday, April 03, 2000 7:31 PM
Subject: [PEN-L:17694] Re: Re: Marx's materialism
>
materialism? How do the
> exponents of evolutionary psychology claim to be able to know this about
> their ideas?
>
> This problem is indirectly pointed to in the third thesis on Feuerbach.
>
> The best critical discussions of scientific materialism in relation to 20th
> cent
14 matches
Mail list logo
