DEAN BAKER ON
John Markoff
New York Times, May 3, 1999, page C1
This article reports on a new product that will facilitate the transfer
of music over the Internet. It also
documents the efforts that the recording industry is taking to prevent
this technology from spreading,
including a court
Posted on 14 Mar 1994 at 10:59:09 by Uriacc Mailer (002033)
New system
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 1994 07:57:23 -0800
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Doug Henwood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's confusing not to have PEN-L listed as the source of a message; the
new software makes everything look like pseudo
ote:
Posted on 14 Mar 1994 at 10:59:09 by Uriacc Mailer (002033)
New system
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 1994 07:57:23 -0800
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Doug Henwood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's confusing not to have PEN-L listed as the source of a message; the
new software makes everything look l
Mr Doug writes:
On the old PEN-L system, PINE used to distinguish between the "From:" and
"Reply to:" fields, and it would ask "Use reply to instead of From?" That
no longer happens - apparently the Reply to: field is empty now. I have
other mailers to choose from here, but I'm habituated to
ote:
Posted on 14 Mar 1994 at 10:59:09 by Uriacc Mailer (002033)
New system
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 1994 07:57:23 -0800
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Doug Henwood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's confusing not to have PEN-L listed as the source of a message; the
new software makes everything look l
Mr Doug writes:
On the old PEN-L system, PINE used to distinguish between the "From:" and
"Reply to:" fields, and it would ask "Use reply to instead of From?" That
no longer happens - apparently the Reply to: field is empty now. I have
other mailers to choose from here, but I'm habituated to
It's confusing not to have PEN-L listed as the source of a message; the
new software makes everything look like pseudo-personalized direct mail.
And, at least on this system (PINE 3.05, on a Sun UNIX), you can't reply
to PEN-L; a reply goes to the author.
Can this be fixed? Or is this the price
