I appreciate Nathan Newman's authoritative contributions and him posting
them here. They combine a sure-footed strategic perspective with a strong
grasp of the concrete detail of the case.
They combine theory with practice.
By what is obviously effective cooperative working with a group of
I realise from being able to read a CNN report that it is indeed the
rejected votes that are scrutinised.
However my question (as amended below) is still relevant for the issue of
money, and still more time.
I see "Bob Crawford, who replaced Gov. Jeb Bush as commissioner of
Florida's
Burford" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2000 6:19 AM
Subject: [PEN-L:4326] 400,000 Palm Beach votes for hand count
I appreciate Nathan Newman's authoritative contributions and him posting
them here. They combine a sure-footed strategic perspective
Nathan Newman wrote,
It's an odd contradiction, but we need to see why voting rights challenges
are THE FUNDAMENTAL FIGHT in eletoral politics, far more important than any
third party diversions, because expanded franchise is a pure expansion of
worker power.
First of all I want to acknowledge
