I am talking about elections under capitalism..
How about electing your own union reps? Officials? Is that something we
can get rid of after the rev. also?
NO!
Steve
Stephen Philion
Lecturer/PhD Candidate
Department of Sociology
2424 Maile Way
Social Sciences Bldg. # 247
Honolulu, HI
Carrol Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/22/00 11:40PM
But certainly no fundamental change of social systems will
ever be approved by an election -- either prior to the change
or in the years immediately after the first break. I draw no
immediate conclusions from this premise -- except perhaps
that
Original Message-
From: Carrol Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Monday, May 22, 2000 11:40 PM
Subject: [PEN-L:19437] Political Constraints, was Re:
:Re:Re:MarxandMalleability (fwd)
"J. Barkley Rosser, Jr." wrote:
The election of
om: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tuesday, May 23, 2000 1:21 AM
Subject: [PEN-L:19440] Political Constraints,was Re:
:Re:Re:MarxandMalleability (fwd)
elections? I am not quite sure about the meaning. Which elections can you
show that can reall
Marx did not explain the features of a future socalist state in details.
The only state he came closer to defend was Paris Commune. Lenin's view of
the state derives its interpretation from a close reading of 18th
Brumier and Civil War in France in _State and Revolution_ as everybody
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/23/00 03:04PM
Marx did not explain the features of a future socalist state in details.
The only state he came closer to defend was Paris Commune. Lenin's view of
the state derives its interpretation from a close reading of 18th
Brumier and Civil War in France in _State
]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tuesday, May 23, 2000 1:21 AM Subject:
[PEN-L:19440] Political Constraints,was Re: :Re:Re:MarxandMalleability
(fwd)
elections? I am not quite sure about the meaning. Which elections can you
show that can really allow me to participate
true((
Mine
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/23/00 03:04PM
Marx did not explain the features of a future socalist state in details.
The only state he came closer to defend was Paris Commune. Lenin's view of
the state derives its interpretation from a close reading of 18th
Brumier and Civil War in
ed..
Mine
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tuesday, May 23, 2000 1:21 AM Subject:
[PEN-L:19440] Political Constraints,was Re: :Re:Re:MarxandMalleability
(fwd)
elections? I am not quite sure about the meaning. Which electio
I grant that much of the time elections are a pathetic waste of
time. But, sometimes they actually do lead to changes in what is
happening. The election of Franklin D. Roosevelt in the US is certainly
one example. The elections in the Scandinavian countries that brought
Social
"J. Barkley Rosser, Jr." wrote:
The election of December saw a victory
by the Socialist Revolutionary Party. Lenin had no good
excuse on Marxist grounds for denying them power.
I don't quite see how "Marxist grounds" bear one way or the
other on this question. There is not that direct
elections? I am not quite sure about the meaning. Which elections can you
show that can really allow me to participate in the selection of people
who run the society".I do not elect bankers!.I do not elect
corporations!.I do not elect multinationals!.They are there illegitimately
(even judged
How about electing your own union reps? Officials? Is that something we
can get rid of after the rev. also?
Steve
Stephen Philion
Lecturer/PhD Candidate
Department of Sociology
2424 Maile Way
Social Sciences Bldg. # 247
Honolulu, HI 96822
On Mon, 22 May 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
13 matches
Mail list logo
