Re: RE: RE: Left Approach to China Trade: A CriticalView

2000-03-30 Thread Jim Devine
>Trade deficits eliminate jobs. There are no two ways about it. In the >U.S. we've had manufacturing jobs replaced by lower paying service >jobs. Our employment is high at the moment, while wage growth has been >mediocre for most of the present recovery (the most recent years a bit better).

Re: RE: RE: Left Approach to China Trade: A CriticalView

2000-03-29 Thread Stephen E Philion
steve wrote orginally: > I'm convinced it'll fail because of the well laid out arguments of people > like Bacon and Tabb (see March issue of Monthly Review). The strategy is > short sighted and will not jive with the American populace, who don't > blame China or trade with China for their problems

RE: RE: Left Approach to China Trade: A CriticalView

2000-03-29 Thread Max B. Sawicky
I'm convinced it'll fail because of the well laid out arguments of people like Bacon and Tabb (see March issue of Monthly Review). The strategy is short sighted and will not jive with the American populace, who don't blame China or trade with China for their problems. > Oh really? On wha

Re: RE: Re: RE: Left Approach to China Trade: A CriticalView

2000-03-29 Thread Stephen E Philion
I'm convinced it'll fail because of the well laid out arguments of people like Bacon and Tabb (see March issue of Monthly Review). The strategy is short sighted and will not jive with the American populace, who don't blame China or trade with China for their problems. I say it will fail for same