Maxster,
Does AG's claim of:
"In contrast, the experience of the past five to seven years has been truly
without recent precedent. The doubling of the growth rate of output per hour has
caused individuals' real taxable income to grow nearly 2-1/2 times as fast as it
did over the preceding ten y
>Greenspan's testimony today is a remarkable
>departure from his operational, hard-right
>conservative mode. It's like a mini-Ayn Rand
>burst out of his chest, a la Alien.
>
>I do not refer to his acquiesence to tax cuts.
>This was not unexpected, merely a sign of his
>political scruples. Boy, i
I think, frankly, he is scared shitless.
Lawrence Lindsay (Lindsey?) hates his
guts and has Dubya's ear, who has heard
nothing good from his old man about Big Al.
And, Dubya was the old man's enforcer at
the White House from what I hear, the ultimate
keeper tracker of who's been naughty and n
Max Sawicky wrote:
<<>>Great image!Max Sawicky also wrote: <<<>>I think there is
another point here besides being pro-Republican and coming up with a
bullshit line to support the tax cut. I think Al, and others, are
looking for a way not to cut the treasury debt because by restructuring
the debt
>Also known as lobbying. Also known as the committee system in Congress
>through which lobbying frequently takes place. Also known as supposedly
>independent regulatory commissions staffed by people recruited from the
>industries allegedly being regulated.
>
>No, we liberalish types aren't bitte
. . .
jibe with M & B's latest S of WA? If not where's AG getting his data from?
[sorry, haven't got my copy of it yet]
mbs: Where are saying there is a contradiction?
Remember, taxable income is a much narrower
category than anything in GDP.
Can I get paid to say this crap, especially the seco
>
> He's a Randite. He's always been a Randite. Conditional on the
> government's size being fixed, he's in favor of budget surpluses. But
> give him an opening where he thinks there's an opportunity to shrink
> the government permanently, and he'll go for it.
>
> And he is really, really sc
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/26/01 12:40PM >>>
>
> He's a Randite. He's always been a Randite. Conditional on the
> government's size being fixed, he's in favor of budget surpluses. But
> give him an opening where he thinks there's an opportunity to shrink
> the government permanently, and he'l
At 02:11 PM 1/26/01 -0500, you wrote:
Dubya was the old man's enforcer
at
the White House from what I hear, the ultimate
keeper tracker of who's been naughty and nice,
I thought that Dubya was too busy trading Sammy Sosa to the Cubs and
things like that when Bush
pére was President.
Jim Devine
>Max Sawicky wrote:
><<>>
>Great image!
Great, great image!
. . .
jibe with M & B's latest S of WA? If not where's AG getting his data from?
[sorry, haven't got my copy of it yet]
mbs: Where are saying there is a contradiction?
Remember, taxable income is a much narrower
category than anything in GDP.
***
I can't make out your fir
A propos, everyone should get their hands on the New York Times article
yesterday on Monsanto and the regulation of GM foods. It provides a useful
perspective on who calls the shots, and who benefits from (at least this)
regulation.
Peter
Lisa & Ian Murray wrote:
> > And he is really, really s
At 03:57 PM 1/26/01 -0500, Charles Brown wrote:
>
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/26/01 12:40PM >>>
>
>>
>> He's a Randite. He's always been a Randite. Conditional on the
>> government's size being fixed, he's in favor of budget surpluses. But
>> give him an opening where he thinks there's an oppor
13 matches
Mail list logo
