Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: G. William Domhoff replies...The whole thing?

2003-03-22 Thread phillp2
Proyect <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject:[PEN-L:35883] Re: Re: Re: RE: G. William Domhoff replies...The whole thing? Send reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Michael Hoover: > > >What for? Professors are paid to do excellent research. > ><<<&

Re: Re: Re: RE: G. William Domhoff replies...The whole thing?

2003-03-21 Thread Joel Blau
Domhoff names names in the structure without conceptualizing it adequately. It's a much more "American" way of going at the issue. At the other extreme, people conceptualize the structure elaborately but do not name any names.  Though each has its advantages and disadvantages, a blend of both is

Re: Re: Re: RE: G. William Domhoff replies...The whole thing?

2003-03-21 Thread Louis Proyect
Michael Hoover: What for? Professors are paid to do excellent research. <<<>>> whatever gave you above idea? I have no idea. It just popped into my head like any other outrageous thought. In any case, here's what a friend of mine, who teaches at a funky NYC community college and who attended Dom

RE: G. William Domhoff replies...The whole thing?

2003-03-21 Thread Sabri Oncu
Now that I have been away from this list for the past two days, spending some time with the Peace Initiave friends over at Turkey, look what happened. Justin, Apparently your spell did not work. Could you please give it a second try? Sabri PS: By the way, there are many fights going on on Turk

Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: G. William Domhoff replies...The whole thing?

2003-03-21 Thread andie nachgeborenen
Let's everybody chill out. Louis' participation in this latest round has been constructive. We needn't have matters degenerate as they have at times. right now there's a war on. Can everyone here be nice to each other over things that don't matter? Louis has actually beeing trying to do that. As fo

Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: G. William Domhoff replies...The whole thing?

2003-03-21 Thread Michael Perelman
Please, let's cool it. There are more important things going on now. Do we really need circular firing squads? On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 12:09:10PM -0500, Louis Proyect wrote: > Doug Henwood wrote: > > And who is centering on personalities? Now it's Domhoff, added to a long > > list of ad hominem

Re: RE: G. William Domhoff replies...The whole thing?

2003-03-21 Thread Louis Proyect
Devine, James wrote: Instead of being pelted with petty personal attacks, Domhoff should be given credit for doing excellent research to produce his books. What for? Professors are paid to do excellent research. Last night I told my wife that 90 percent of the people on lists like PEN-L and PSN

Re: G. William Domhoff replies...The whole thing?

2003-03-21 Thread Louis Proyect
I did forward the whole thing. It was just interspersed by my own comments. I did get another message from him that is not worth commenting on. -- The Marxism list: www.marxmail.org

RE: Re: RE: G. William Domhoff replies...The whole thing?

2003-03-21 Thread Devine, James
Title: RE: [PEN-L:35859] Re: RE: G. William Domhoff replies...The whole thing? > I think with the killing of people in Iraq, Palestine, > we don't need > to center on personalities. That's what I was saying: petty attacks on Domhoff and the like are di

Re: RE: G. William Domhoff replies...The whole thing?

2003-03-21 Thread Michael Perelman
I think with the killing of people in Iraq, Palestine, we don't need to center on personalities. On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 07:56:11AM -0800, Devine, James wrote: > Instead of being pelted with petty personal attacks, Domhoff should be given > credit for doing excellent research to produce his b

RE: G. William Domhoff replies...The whole thing?

2003-03-21 Thread Devine, James
Title: RE: [PEN-L:35855] G. William Domhoff replies...The whole thing? Instead of being pelted with petty personal attacks, Domhoff should be given credit for doing excellent research to produce his books. His theory's not very deep (in my humble opinion), but most of the people on pen-l are s